Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Initiation of Translation02:33

Initiation of Translation

Initiating translation is complex because it involves multiple molecules. Initiator tRNA, ribosomal subunits, and eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) are all required to assemble on the initiation codon of mRNA. This process consists of several steps that are mediated by different eIFs.
First, the initiator tRNA must be selected from the pool of elongator tRNAs by eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2). The initiator tRNA (Met-tRNAi) has conserved sequence elements including modified bases at...
Initiation of Translation02:33

Initiation of Translation

Initiating translation is complex because it involves multiple molecules. Initiator tRNA, ribosomal subunits, and eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) are all required to assemble on the initiation codon of mRNA. This process consists of several steps that are mediated by different eIFs.
First, the initiator tRNA must be selected from the pool of elongator tRNAs by eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2). The initiator tRNA (Met-tRNAi) has conserved sequence elements including modified bases at...
Cotranslational Protein Translocation01:20

Cotranslational Protein Translocation

Translocation of proteins across membranes is an ancient process that occurs even in bacteria and archaebacteria. In fact, the components of the translocation machinery are still conserved between prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
Sec61 channel partners for cotranslational translocation
During cotranslational translocation, the Sec61 channel partners with the signal recognition particle (SRP), the signal recognition particle receptor (SR), and the ribosomes to transport the nascent polypeptide chain...
Ribosomal RNA Synthesis02:53

Ribosomal RNA Synthesis

Ribosome synthesis is a highly complex and coordinated process involving more than 200 assembly factors. The synthesis and processing of ribosomal components occurs not only in the nucleolus but also in the nucleoplasm and the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells.
Ribosome biogenesis begins with the synthesis of 5S and 45S pre-rRNAs by distinct RNA polymerases. The primary transcripts are extensively processed and modified before they are bound and folded by ribosomal proteins and assembly factors,...
Ribosomal RNA Synthesis02:53

Ribosomal RNA Synthesis

Ribosome synthesis is a highly complex and coordinated process involving more than 200 assembly factors. The synthesis and processing of ribosomal components occurs not only in the nucleolus but also in the nucleoplasm and the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells.
Ribosome biogenesis begins with the synthesis of 5S and 45S pre-rRNAs by distinct RNA polymerases. The primary transcripts are extensively processed and modified before they are bound and folded by ribosomal proteins and assembly factors,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Role of Artificial Intelligence in bioinformatics: Revolutionizing molecular docking and DNA tokenization.

Computational biology and chemistry·2026
Same author

Happy faces, faster stops: The cognitive benefits of dance in emotional contexts.

Psychology of sport and exercise·2026
Same author

CRISPRi-mediated <i>in vivo</i> gene silencing: a tool for prioritizing drug targets in <i>Mycobacterium abscessus</i>.

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy·2026
Same author

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer-associated fibroblasts in tumor progression and therapy resistance: mechanistic convergence and therapeutic opportunities.

Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico·2026
Same author

Single-molecule dynamics of the TRiC chaperonin system in vivo.

Nature·2026
Same author

Retention and Engagement in Culturally Adapted Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review of Dropout, Attrition, and Adherence in Non-Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic Settings.

JMIR mental health·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Global Identification of Co-Translational Interaction Networks by Selective Ribosome Profiling
06:58

Global Identification of Co-Translational Interaction Networks by Selective Ribosome Profiling

Published on: October 7, 2021

Versatility of trigger factor interactions with ribosome-nascent chain complexes.

Sathish Kumar Lakshmipathy1, Rashmi Gupta, Stefan Pinkert

  • 1Department of Cellular Biochemistry, Max-Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried 82152, Germany.

The Journal of Biological Chemistry
|July 3, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Trigger factor (TF) binds to nascent polypeptide chains emerging from bacterial ribosomes, with longer interactions observed for hydrophobic sequences. TF utilizes multiple mechanisms to bind diverse substrate proteins.

More Related Videos

Single Molecule Fluorescence Energy Transfer Study of Ribosome Protein Synthesis
08:07

Single Molecule Fluorescence Energy Transfer Study of Ribosome Protein Synthesis

Published on: July 6, 2021

Isolation of Translating Ribosomes Containing Peptidyl-tRNAs for Functional and Structural Analyses
11:19

Isolation of Translating Ribosomes Containing Peptidyl-tRNAs for Functional and Structural Analyses

Published on: February 25, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Global Identification of Co-Translational Interaction Networks by Selective Ribosome Profiling
06:58

Global Identification of Co-Translational Interaction Networks by Selective Ribosome Profiling

Published on: October 7, 2021

Single Molecule Fluorescence Energy Transfer Study of Ribosome Protein Synthesis
08:07

Single Molecule Fluorescence Energy Transfer Study of Ribosome Protein Synthesis

Published on: July 6, 2021

Isolation of Translating Ribosomes Containing Peptidyl-tRNAs for Functional and Structural Analyses
11:19

Isolation of Translating Ribosomes Containing Peptidyl-tRNAs for Functional and Structural Analyses

Published on: February 25, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Molecular biology
  • Protein folding
  • Bacterial protein synthesis

Background:

  • Trigger factor (TF) is a primary molecular chaperone interacting with nascent polypeptide chains during bacterial protein synthesis.
  • TF is composed of N-terminal ribosome binding, PPIase, and C-terminal domains involved in polypeptide interaction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To directly monitor the interactions of TF with nascent polypeptide chains using site-specifically labeled TF variants.
  • To investigate the binding mechanisms and substrate specificity of TF.

Main Methods:

  • Site-specific labeling of TF variants with an NBD fluorophore for fluorescence monitoring.
  • Translation of firefly luciferase and other proteins to study TF-nascent chain interactions.
  • Classification of the E. coli proteome based on predicted TF interaction strength.

Main Results:

  • TF fluorescence increased significantly with hydrophobic nascent chains (e.g., luciferase) but not with less hydrophobic chains.
  • TF residence time on nascent chains (111 ± 7 s) was much longer than on ribosomes (t(1/2) ≈ 10–14 s), indicating multiple TF molecules can bind per chain.
  • TF binding correlated with hydrophobic regions and the ability of nascent chains to bury hydrophobicity, but also recognized discontinuous hydrophobic features and bound a folded protein domain, suggesting diverse mechanisms.

Conclusions:

  • TF interacts with nascent polypeptide chains through multiple mechanisms, including recognition of linear and discontinuous hydrophobic segments, and binding to folded protein domains.
  • TF exhibits broad substrate specificity, interacting with a wide range of proteins beyond just hydrophobic nascent chains.
  • TF's extended residence time on nascent chains suggests a crucial role in early protein folding and quality control in bacteria.