Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Data Collection by Observations01:08

Data Collection by Observations

Data collection refers to a systematic way of obtaining, observing, measuring, and analyzing accurate information. Observational studies are one of the most widely used methods of data collection. It involves collecting data by observing the behavior and physical characteristics of a sample without making any modifications to the sample.
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...
Introduction to Epidemiology01:26

Introduction to Epidemiology

Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Secondary Prevention Risk Interventions via Telemedicine and Tailored Patient Education (SPRITE): A randomized trial to improve post myocardial infarction management.

Patient education and counseling·2022
Same author

Association of physical activity on blood glucose in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Translational behavioral medicine·2021
Same author

Trends of blood pressure control in the U.S. during the COVID-19 pandemic.

American heart journal·2021
Same author

Impact of a diabetes remote monitoring program on medication adherence.

Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy·2021
Same author

Real-World Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Comparison of Thromboprophylactic Use of Enoxaparin versus Unfractionated Heparin in 376,858 Medically Ill Hospitalized US Patients.

American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions·2020
Same author

Comparative Effectiveness and Costs of Enoxaparin Monotherapy Versus Unfractionated Heparin Monotherapy in Treating Acute Coronary Syndrome.

American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Leveraging observational registries to inform comparative effectiveness research.

Bimal R Shah1, Joseph Drozda, Eric D Peterson

  • 1Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA. bimal.shah@duke.edu

American Heart Journal
|July 6, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) definition remains unclear, encompassing diverse studies. This review clarifies CER scope, focusing on observational registries for evidence generation.

More Related Videos

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
10:38

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
10:38

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Clinical Research Methodology
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) is increasingly prominent but lacks a clear, unified definition.
  • Conflicting views exist: CER as a tool for improving care and reducing costs versus a threat to new therapy development.
  • CER encompasses a broad range of research, including randomized trials, observational data analysis, and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER).
  • To explore the opportunities and potential pitfalls of using observational registries within CER.
  • To clarify the scope and impact of CER on healthcare quality and innovation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature and definitions of Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER).
  • Analysis of the spectrum of research domains included under the CER umbrella.
  • Examination of the role and implications of observational data and registries in CER.

Main Results:

  • Significant confusion exists regarding the precise definition and scope of CER.
  • Federal mandates are increasing funding and prominence for observational CER.
  • Observational registries present both opportunities and challenges for expanding evidence through CER.

Conclusions:

  • A clear definition of CER is needed to guide research and policy.
  • Observational registries are crucial for future CER but require careful design and interpretation.
  • Balancing the potential of CER to improve care with concerns about stifling innovation is essential.