Percutaneous coronary intervention for small vessel coronary artery disease
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai1, Claudio Moretti, Antonio Abbate
1Interventional Cardiology, Division of Cardiology, University of Turin, S. Giovanni Battista "Molinette" Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy. gbiondizoccai@gmail.com <gbiondizoccai@gmail.com>
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for small vessel coronary artery disease can lead to restenosis. Drug-eluting stents significantly improve outcomes, reducing restenosis risk in these challenging cases.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Symptomatic coronary artery disease often involves small caliber coronary vessels (<2.75 mm).
- Revascularization via percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or bypass surgery is considered when medical therapy fails.
- PCI in small vessels carries a significant risk of midterm restenosis, even with modern devices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review percutaneous coronary revascularization strategies for small vessel coronary artery disease.
- To highlight the role of drug-eluting stents in improving outcomes.
- To provide an updated perspective on managing these complex cases.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature on percutaneous coronary intervention for small coronary vessels.
- Analysis of outcomes associated with different PCI techniques and stent types.
- Focus on angiographic and clinical results, particularly restenosis rates.
Main Results:
- Drug-eluting stents demonstrate improved angiographic and clinical outcomes compared to balloon-only PCI or bare-metal stents.
- Very low late lumen loss (<0.20 mm) with drug-eluting stents is associated with better results.
- Despite advancements, small vessel PCI remains associated with a notable risk of restenosis.
Conclusions:
- Drug-eluting stents are crucial for improving outcomes in percutaneous coronary intervention for small vessel coronary artery disease.
- Careful selection of devices and techniques is essential to mitigate restenosis risk.
- Further research and technological advancements are needed for optimal management.
Abstract:
Symptomatic coronary artery disease may be commonly due to significant atherosclerotic disease involving coronary vessels of relatively small caliber (i.e., with reference vessel diameter <2.75 mm). Whenever medical therapy fails and in other selected cases, revascularization by means of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or bypass surgery is indicated even for small vessel coronary disease. However, despite the numerous developments and improvements in devices and techniques, PCI of small coronary vessels is still fraught with a significant risk of midterm restenosis after both balloon-only PCI and bare-metal stent implantation. Drug-eluting stents, especially those associated with very low angiographic late lumen loss (<0.20 mm), appear to significantly improve angiographic and clinical outcomes after PCI of small coronary vessels. The present article provides a concise and updated review on percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with symptomatic small vessel coronary artery disease.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Angina IV: Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies