Related Experiment Videos
Small numbers limit the use of the inpatient pediatric quality indicators for hospital comparison
Naomi S Bardach1, Alyna T Chien, R Adams Dudley
1Department of General Pediatrics and Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA. bardachn@peds.ucsf.edu
Insights
Many hospitals lack sufficient pediatric patient volumes to reliably assess performance using Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) pediatric quality indicators (PDIs). Low event rates further hinder meaningful comparisons of inpatient pediatric care quality.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Quality and Safety
- Pediatric Health Outcomes
- Health Services Research
Background:
- The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) developed pediatric quality indicators (PDIs) to measure adverse events in pediatric inpatient care.
- These PDIs are nationally endorsed and publicly reported in some states, aiming to improve healthcare quality.
- Assessing hospital performance requires adequate sample sizes to ensure statistically meaningful comparisons.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the percentage of hospitals with adequate sample sizes for meaningful performance comparisons using AHRQ PDIs.
- To evaluate the feasibility of identifying hospitals with significantly worse performance based on current pediatric inpatient data.
- To assess the impact of low event rates and hospital volume on the reliability of PDIs.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional analysis of California hospital discharges for patients under 18 years from 2005-2007 was conducted.
- For nine hospital-level PDIs, eligible pediatric patient volumes were calculated per hospital.
- The percentage of hospitals meeting the volume threshold to detect an event rate twice the statewide mean was determined.
Main Results:
- Nationwide event rates for PDIs ranged from 0.2 to 38 per 1000 discharges.
- Detecting an event rate twice the statewide average required substantial patient volumes (e.g., 49,869 for iatrogenic pneumothorax).
- A significant proportion of California hospitals (0% to 25%) had inadequate pediatric volumes for specific PDIs.
Conclusions:
- Many hospitals have insufficient pediatric patient volumes to reliably use AHRQ PDIs for performance comparison.
- Extremely low event rates and inadequate hospital volumes limit the ability to identify hospitals with significantly worse performance.
- Current PDIs may not be effective for identifying performance disparities in pediatric inpatient care due to data limitations.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to determine the percentage of hospitals with adequate sample size to meaningfully compare performance by using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) pediatric quality indicators (PDIs), which measure pediatric inpatient adverse events such as decubitus ulcer rate and infections due to medical care, have been nationally endorsed, and are currently publicly reported in at least 2 states.
Methods:
We performed a cross-sectional analysis of California hospital discharges from 2005-2007 for patients aged <18 years. For 9 hospital-level PDIs, after excluding discharges with PDIs indicated as present on admission, we determined for each PDI the volume of eligible pediatric patients for each measure at each hospital, the statewide mean rate, and the percentage of hospitals with adequate volume to identify an adverse event rate twice the statewide mean.
Results:
Unadjusted California-wide event rates for PDIs during the study period (N = 2 333 556 discharges) were 0.2 to 38 per 1000 discharges. Event rates for specific measures were, for example, 0.2 per 1000 (iatrogenic pneumothorax in non-neonates), 19 per 1000 (postoperative sepsis), and 38 per 1000 (pediatric heart surgery mortality), requiring patient volumes of 49 869, 419, and 201 to detect an event rate twice the statewide average; 0%, 6.6%, and 25%, respectively, of California hospitals had this pediatric volume.
Conclusion:
Using these AHRQ-developed, nationally endorsed measures of the quality of inpatient pediatric care, one would not be able to identify many hospitals with performance 2 times worse than the statewide average due to extremely low event rates and inadequate pediatric hospital volume.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in hospitals have...