Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
Published on: November 16, 2017
Dissociation of visual C1 and P1 components as a function of attentional load: an event-related potential study
Shimin Fu1, John R Fedota, Pamela M Greenwood
1Department of Psychology, Tsinghua University, Haidan, Beijing, China. sfu@tsinghua.edu.cn
Abstract:
The earliest cortical location at which attention influences visual processing is controversial. To address this issue, the C1 and P1 components of cue-elicited ERPs were examined in a spatially-cued task under high and low levels of attentional load (active vs. passive viewing). Cues were presented either to the left or to the right visual field in separate trials (unilateral presentation), or to both visual fields simultaneously (bilateral presentation). For the unilateral presentation, C1 (peak latency approximately 80 ms) was not modulated by attentional load, whereas P1 (peak latency approximately 120-140 ms) was larger for high-relative to low-load condition. Bilateral presentation of the stimuli enhanced the amplitude of the C1 component relative to unilateral presentation; however, the increase of signal/noise ratio of C1 revealed no attentional load effect on C1. Results show that attentional load modulates visual processing in the P1, but not in the C1 time range, regardless of the increased signal/noise ratio by bilateral presentation. While it remains unclear about the conditions under which a C1 attentional effect is reliably elicited, the present results suggest that the direct manipulation of attentional load under a voluntary attention task seems not crucial for eliciting C1 attentional effect.
More Related Videos
06:46Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
Published on: March 18, 2019
13:00Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017