Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
Detection of Black Holes01:10

Detection of Black Holes

Although black holes were theoretically postulated in the 1920s, they remained outside the domain of observational astronomy until the 1970s.
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advances in the management of ADHD in children and adolescents.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

Transdiagnostic Behavioral Phenotypes and Comorbid Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: An Exploratory Study.

Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research·2025
Same author

Vincristine-induced brain toxicity is reduced with prevention of peripheral axon degeneration in Sarm1 knockout mice.

Acta neuropathologica communications·2025
Same author

The "route cause" of methotrexate-induced brain structure changes in a juvenile mouse model: Comparison of systemic and CNS-targeted chemotherapy.

Neurotoxicology·2025
Same author

Social Skills as a Predictor of Mental Health Trajectories among Autistic Youth and Youth with ADHD during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Research on child and adolescent psychopathology·2025
Same author

Characterizing replicability in the clustering structure of brain morphology in autism, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and obsessive compulsive disorder.

Translational psychiatry·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

Error detection in the stop signal task.

Andre Chevrier1, Russell J Schachar

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Neuroimage
|July 6, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals how the brain detects errors, showing deactivations in dopamine pathways and subsequent adjustments in control regions. These findings illuminate error processing and reinforcement learning mechanisms.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Reinforcement Learning

Background:

  • Previous research localized error detection to the anterior cingulate cortex or implicated midbrain dopamine pathways in reinforcement learning.
  • The precise neural mechanisms underlying error detection and subsequent behavioral adjustments remain incompletely understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whole-brain neural correlates of error detection using a novel functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) design.
  • To elucidate the role of dopamine pathways and associated control structures in error processing and post-error adjustments.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a novel fMRI design during the stop-signal task (SST) with 14 healthy adult volunteers.
  • Employed distinct within-trial regressors to analyze neural activity immediately before errors and after post-error slowing.

More Related Videos

A Flexible Platform for Monitoring Cerebellum-Dependent Sensory Associative Learning
11:32

A Flexible Platform for Monitoring Cerebellum-Dependent Sensory Associative Learning

Published on: January 19, 2022

Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition
08:55

Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition

Published on: February 8, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

A Flexible Platform for Monitoring Cerebellum-Dependent Sensory Associative Learning
11:32

A Flexible Platform for Monitoring Cerebellum-Dependent Sensory Associative Learning

Published on: January 19, 2022

Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition
08:55

Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition

Published on: February 8, 2018

  • Examined whole-brain activity patterns associated with error detection and behavioral adjustments.

    • Main Results:

    • Error detection was associated with deactivation in midbrain dopamine neuron origins (dorsal substantia nigra) and primary targets (dorsal striatum, ventral anterior cingulate).
    • Posterior hippocampus, sensitive to dopamine's synaptic plasticity effects, also showed deactivation during error detection.
    • Errors leading to slowed responses deactivated regions controlling dopamine output (ventral midbrain, ventral striatum, caudal orbitofrontal cortex), which also showed increased activity during post-error slowing.

    Conclusions:

    • Error detection involves deactivation of dopamine-recipient structures, followed by engagement of dopamine-modulating control structures for behavioral adjustment.
    • Findings support a reinforcement learning framework where errors trigger adaptive changes mediated by dopamine pathways and their regulatory networks.