Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:

Toxic Reactions: Overview

Toxic Reactions: Overview

When toxic substances penetrate the human body, they disseminate to various tissues, undergoing metabolic changes. This process yields reactive metabolites that may covalently bind with specific target molecules, resulting in toxicity.
Toxicity falls into two primary categories: local and systemic.
Local toxicity appears at the exposure site, such as protein denaturation caused by caustic substances.
In contrast, systemic toxicity requires the toxic agent's absorption and distribution,...

Cancer Prevention

Cancer Prevention

Several factors can increase the risk of cancer in an individual. About 50% of cancer cases can be prevented by adopting a healthy lifestyle, regular exercise, eating healthy, and following a modest cancer prevention diet. Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that populations with vegetable and fruit-rich diets have reduced the incidence of cancer. On the other hand, populations who have a diet rich in animal fat, red meat, junk food, or high calories are predisposed to cancer.
Some...

Types of Toxins

Types of Toxins

Humans continually engage with an environment rich in potentially harmful chemicals. These are introduced to our bodies through inhalation, ingestion, or skin contact. These chemicals exist in various forms, such as air and environmental pollutants, agricultural chemicals, organic solvents, and heavy metals.
Air pollutants, primarily gases, pose significant threats to respiratory health, leading to conditions like hypoxia, lung cancer, and in extreme cases, death.
Environmental pollutants like...

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Comment on: Early Death Among Firefighters: The Need for Further Investigation.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2026

Same author

Surveillance of Non-Malignant Asbestos-Related Diseases in an Exposed Population: A Scoping Review.

Annals of global health·2026

Same author

Sheldon W. Samuels, A Champion of Air Pollution Control and Worker Health.

American journal of industrial medicine·2025

Same author

Continuity or Change: Occupational Health Policies of Key Organizations in Great Britain After the Major COVID Waves 2020-2022.

New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS·2025

Same author

Letter to the Editor re: Medical Consequences After a Fume Event in Commercial Airline Crews.

Aerospace medicine and human performance·2025

Same author

Asbestos Exposure in Low-Middle Income Communities of Cartagena, Colombia: A Survey of Knowledge, Practices, and Environmental Contamination.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Implantation and Monitoring by PET/CT of an Orthotopic Model of Human Pleural Mesothelioma in Athymic Mice

Implantation and Monitoring by PET/CT of an Orthotopic Model of Human Pleural Mesothelioma in Athymic Mice

Published on: December 21, 2019

The case for a global ban on asbestos.

Joseph LaDou¹, Barry Castleman, Arthur Frank

¹University of California-San Francisco, USA. joeladou@aol.com

Environmental Health Perspectives

|July 6, 2010

Summary

Chrysotile asbestos, despite its widespread use, is a proven human carcinogen. No safe exposure level exists, and an urgent international ban is needed to prevent asbestos-related illnesses and deaths.

More Related Videos

Establishing a Silicosis Rat Model via Exposure of Whole-Body to Respirable Silica

Establishing a Silicosis Rat Model via Exposure of Whole-Body to Respirable Silica

Published on: October 28, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Implantation and Monitoring by PET/CT of an Orthotopic Model of Human Pleural Mesothelioma in Athymic Mice

Implantation and Monitoring by PET/CT of an Orthotopic Model of Human Pleural Mesothelioma in Athymic Mice

Published on: December 21, 2019

Establishing a Silicosis Rat Model via Exposure of Whole-Body to Respirable Silica

Establishing a Silicosis Rat Model via Exposure of Whole-Body to Respirable Silica

Published on: October 28, 2022

Area of Science:

Environmental Health
Occupational Health
Public Health

Background:

Despite bans in 52 countries, asbestos use persists globally, with chrysotile asbestos comprising over 95% of historical usage.
Exemptions for chrysotile asbestos, often termed "controlled use," continue in many nations that have banned other asbestos forms.
The asbestos mining and manufacturing industry exerts significant political and economic influence on asbestos regulations.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically evaluate scientific and political literature supporting chrysotile asbestos exemptions.
To analyze the influence of the asbestos industry on the continued use of chrysotile.
To advocate for a comprehensive global ban on all asbestos types.

Main Methods:

Literature review of scientific publications.
Analysis of political and economic factors influencing asbestos policy.
Evaluation of industry-supported research versus independent scientific consensus.

Main Results:

All asbestos forms, including chrysotile, are definitively classified as human carcinogens.
Asbestos exposure is linked to malignant mesothelioma, lung, laryngeal, ovarian, and gastrointestinal cancers.
No safe threshold for asbestos exposure has been established; all exposures carry risk.

Conclusions:

A global ban on all asbestos mining, manufacture, and use is imperative for public health.
There is no scientific or medical justification for exempting chrysotile asbestos from a worldwide ban.
Preventing asbestos-related diseases and fatalities requires immediate international cooperation and legislative action.