Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...

Binomial Probability Distribution

Binomial Probability Distribution

A binomial distribution is a probability distribution for a procedure with a fixed number of trials, where each trial can have only two outcomes.
The outcomes of a binomial experiment fit a binomial probability distribution. A statistical experiment can be classified as a binomial experiment if the following conditions are met:
There are a fixed number of trials. Think of trials as repetitions of an experiment. The letter n denotes the number of trials.
There are only two possible outcomes,...

Bonferroni Test

Bonferroni Test

The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...

McNemar's Test

McNemar's Test

McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Predicting microbial crude protein synthesis in cattle from intakes of dietary energy and crude protein.

Journal of animal science·2023

Same author

Assessment of the helminth fauna in northern bobwhites (<i>Colinus virginianus</i>) occurring within South Texas.

Journal of helminthology·2021

Same author

[Helminth fauna in a semi-arid host species - scaled quail (<i>Callipepla squamata</i>)].

Journal of helminthology·2019

Same author

Helminth community and host dynamics in northern bobwhites from the Rolling Plains Ecoregion, U.S.A.

Journal of helminthology·2018

Same author

Effects of tannic acid on growth performance, carcass characteristics, digestibility, nitrogen volatilization, and meat lipid oxidation of steers fed steam-flaked corn-based finishing diets.

Journal of animal science·2018

Same author

Dennis Murray Hallford (1948-2016): A brief biography.

Journal of animal science·2017

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Comparison of multinomial and binomial proportion methods for analysis of multinomial count data.

M L Galyean¹, D B Wester

¹Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-2141, USA. michael.galyean@ttu.edu

Journal of Animal Science

|July 6, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Analyzing multinomial count data using binomial proportions maintains the type I error rate but can reduce statistical power, especially with fewer sampling units. Power varies by category, with the most frequent category showing similar power to multinomial analysis.

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Area of Science:

Statistics
Experimental Design
Biostatistics

Background:

Multinomial distributions are common for analyzing count data with multiple ordered or nominal categories in experimental settings.
Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) are often used for analyzing such data, but simpler binomial analyses are sometimes considered.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the statistical performance of analyzing multinomial count data using multinomial models versus analyzing individual binomial proportions.
To evaluate type I error rates and statistical power under different experimental designs (completely randomized design and randomized complete block design) and sampling unit scenarios.

Main Methods:

Simulated 1,000 experiments with 3 treatments and varying numbers of experimental units under CRD and RCB designs.
Generated count data from 3-category ordered and 4-category nominal multinomial distributions with specified probabilities.
Analyzed data using GLMMs with cumulative logit (ordered) or glogit (nominal) links, and by regrouping data into binomial proportions.

Main Results:

Type I error rates did not differ between multinomial and binomial analyses for 3-category data with 10 or 50 sampling units/experimental unit.
Statistical power varied among categories in binomial analyses, with the most frequent category yielding power comparable to multinomial analysis.
Power decreased as the number of sampling units per experimental unit decreased; increasing block effects in RCB designs reduced power.

Conclusions:

Analyzing single binomial categories from multinomial data does not inflate the type I error rate but can lead to variable power.
Analyzing multinomial data as a series of binomial proportions may increase the experiment-wise type I error rate.
Limited sampling units per experimental unit significantly reduce power for detecting treatment differences in count data, particularly for less frequent categories.