Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Sublingual Immunotherapy as an Alternative to Induce Protection Against Acute Respiratory Infections
Published on: August 30, 2014
[Economic impact of introducing the injectable inactivated polio vaccine in Colombia]
Nelson Alvis1, Fernando De la Hoz, Javier Narváez
1Grupo de Investigación en Economía de la Salud, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad de Cartagena, Campus de la Piedra de Bolívar, Cartagena, Colombia. nalvis@yahoo.com
Insights
Introducing the injectable inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) in Colombia is not cost-effective compared to the oral polio vaccine (OPV). The analysis indicates that switching to IPV would incur significantly higher costs without substantial public health benefits for preventing polio.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Vaccinology
- Health Economics
Background:
- Colombia currently utilizes the oral polio vaccine (OPV) for its immunization program.
- The injectable inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) is an alternative vaccination strategy.
- Evaluating the economic implications of vaccine introduction is crucial for healthcare policy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the cost-effectiveness of introducing the inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) in Colombia.
- To compare the economic impact of IPV versus the existing oral polio vaccine (OPV) program.
- To analyze the costs associated with vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs).
Main Methods:
- A Markov model was developed to simulate a cohort of newborns receiving either OPV or IPV.
- The model included a two-year follow-up period with monthly estimations of VAPP incidence.
- Cost analysis was conducted from both insurer and societal perspectives, considering lifetime costs and DALYs.
Main Results:
- Over 22.5 million OPV doses administered from 1988-1998 resulted in nine VAPP cases.
- The model projected 2-4 VAPP cases in the subsequent two years.
- IPV vaccination costs were significantly higher (US$5,527,777) than OPV (US$737,037), with VAPP treatment costs at US$302,008. IPV prevented 64 DALYs at US$71,062 per DALY, and preventing one VAPP case via substitution cost US$1.8-2.2 million.
Conclusions:
- Substituting OPV with IPV in Colombia is not a cost-effective strategy.
- This conclusion holds even when considering the potential replacement of the whole-cell pertussis vaccine with an acellular vaccine combined with IPV.
Objective:
Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of introducing the injectable inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) in Colombia versus the current system based on the use of the oral vaccine (OPV).
Methods:
A Markov model was designed, based on a hypothetical cohort of newborns that would receive the IPV or the OPV vaccine, with a two-year follow-up and monthly estimates of the number of cases of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) that would emerge. The cost was analyzed from the perspective of the insurer (costs throughout life) and society (cases of VAPP and disability-adjusted life years [DALYs] prevented).
Results:
From 1988 to 1998, some 22.5 million doses of OVP were administered in Colombia and nine cases of VAPP were detected, for a rate of 4.0 yen 10-7 dose. According to the model, 2 to 4 cases of VAPP could be anticipated in the following two years. The cost of treating the VAPP cases would total US$302,008, with the cost of vaccination with OPV coming to US$737,037 and with IPV, US$5,527,777. Vaccination with IPV would prevent 64 DALYs, at a cost of US$71,062 per DALY prevented; preventing one case of VAPP by substituting OPV with IPV would cost between US$1.8 and US$2.2 million.
Conclusions:
Substituting OPV with IPV is not a cost-effective measure in Colombia, even if the cellular vaccine against whooping cough currently in use were replaced with an acellular vaccine combined with an IPV.
Related Concept Videos
Poliomyelitis
Smallpox
Vaccinations
Vaccine Production
Vaccines
Parenteral Drug Delivery Systems: Injectables, Implants, and Infusion Devices

