Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Shrinkage estimators of the spatial relative risk function.

Statistics in medicine·2023
Same author

New tools for the investigation of muscle fiber-type spatial distributions across histological sections.

Skeletal muscle·2023
Same author

Towards equitable scheduling of global health teleconferences: a spatial exploration of the world's population and health by time zone.

BMJ open·2022
Same author

The spatio-temporal distribution of COVID-19 infection in England between January and June 2020.

Epidemiology and infection·2021
Same author

Utilisation of retinal vein photoplethysmography to measure intracranial pressure.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2020
Same author

Application of kernel smoothing to estimate the spatio-temporal variation in risk of STEC O157 in England.

Spatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology·2020
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Adaptive kernel estimation of spatial relative risk.

Tilman M Davies1, Martin L Hazelton

  • 1Institute of Fundamental Sciences-Statistics, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Statistics in Medicine
|July 7, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces an adaptive kernel estimator for disease risk mapping, outperforming traditional fixed-bandwidth methods. It offers improved spatial inhomogeneity handling and practical implementation for identifying high-risk areas.

More Related Videos

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Spatial Statistics
  • Geographical Information Systems

Background:

  • Kernel smoothing is standard for relative risk estimation in geographical epidemiology.
  • Fixed-bandwidth kernel methods struggle with spatial inhomogeneity in disease densities.
  • Spatially adaptive methods offer a more intuitive approach to smoothing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the adaptive kernel estimator for relative risk estimation.
  • To compare its performance against the fixed kernel approach.
  • To address practical implementation challenges and risk highlighting.

Main Methods:

  • Asymptotic analysis of the adaptive kernel estimator.
  • Simulation studies to assess performance.
  • Development of computationally inexpensive methods for risk contour generation.

Main Results:

  • The adaptive kernel estimator demonstrates advantages over the fixed kernel approach.
  • Identified benefits in handling spatial inhomogeneity.
  • Developed practical solutions for bandwidth selection, boundary correction, and risk contouring.

Conclusions:

  • Adaptive kernel smoothing is superior to fixed-bandwidth methods for relative risk estimation in geographical epidemiology.
  • The proposed methods enhance the practical application of adaptive kernel estimators.
  • This approach effectively highlights areas of significantly elevated disease risk.