Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a survival tree begins...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Ranks01:02

Ranks

Unlike parametric methods, nonparametric statistics are ideal for nominal and ordinal data, requiring fewer assumptions about the population's nature or distribution. This makes nonparametric methods easier to apply and interpret, as they do not depend on parameters like mean or standard deviation. One common approach in nonparametric analysis is to sort data according to a specific criterion. For instance, we might arrange weather data from hottest to coldest days in a month or rank cities...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Air Conditioning Load Data Generation Method Based on DTW Clustering and Physically Constrained TimeGAN.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Novel bioinformatic methods and machine learning approaches reveal candidate biomarkers of the intensity and timing of past exposure to Plasmodium falciparum.

PLOS global public health·2023
Same author

A Bayesian hierarchical model for signal extraction from protein microarrays.

Statistics in medicine·2023
Same author

Effect of Abandoned Housing Interventions on Gun Violence, Perceptions of Safety, and Substance Use in Black Neighborhoods: A Citywide Cluster Randomized Trial.

JAMA internal medicine·2022
Same author

Whole Blood Transfusion for Severe Malarial Anemia in a High Plasmodium falciparum Transmission Setting.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·2022
Same author

A Multicentered Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Pain Treatment Communication Tools in Emergency Department Patients With Back or Kidney Stone Pain.

American journal of public health·2022
Same journal

A Tree Perspective on Stick-Breaking Models in Covariate-Dependent Mixtures (with Discussion).

Bayesian analysis·2026
Same journal

Coarsened Mixtures of Hierarchical Skew Normal Kernels for Flow and Mass Cytometry Analyses.

Bayesian analysis·2026
Same journal

Bayesian Inference for Spatial-Temporal Non-Gaussian Data Using Predictive Stacking.

Bayesian analysis·2026
Same journal

A Two-Component <i>G</i>-Prior for Variable Selection.

Bayesian analysis·2026
Same journal

Logistic-Beta Processes for Dependent Random Probabilities with Beta Marginals.

Bayesian analysis·2026
Same journal

Gridding and Parameter Expansion for Scalable Latent Gaussian Models of Spatial Multivariate Data.

Bayesian analysis·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

Loss Function Based Ranking in Two-Stage, Hierarchical Models.

Rongheng Lin1, Thomas A Louis, Susan M Paddock

  • 1National Institute of Environmental Health Science, Research Triangle Park, NC, linr2@niehs.nih.gov.

Bayesian Analysis
|July 8, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a Bayesian hierarchical model for ranking performance across various fields, from healthcare to genetics. It shows that while general-purpose ranks are useful, specific loss functions improve accuracy for identifying top or bottom performers.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Statistical modeling
  • Biostatistics
  • Health services research

Background:

  • Performance evaluations and rankings are increasingly important in diverse fields like healthcare, education, and genomics.
  • Existing methods often require hierarchical models to account for nested data structures and identify both population-level and unit-specific parameters.
  • Bayesian approaches offer a flexible framework for complex inferences, including rankings and performance profiling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a unified Bayesian framework for ranking units based on various performance metrics.
  • To compare different loss functions for estimating ranks, focusing on both general-purpose accuracy and application-specific goals like identifying top/bottom performers.
  • To assess the performance of these ranking methods using real-world data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a hierarchical Bayesian model with Gaussian distributions for sampling and prior distributions.
  • Investigated loss functions, including Squared Error Loss (SEL) and classification error-based loss functions.
  • Developed a unified framework for generating, comparing, and summarizing the performance of different ranking estimates.
  • Applied the methods to analyze standardized mortality ratio data from the United States Renal Data System.

Main Results:

  • Posterior mean ranks, minimizing Squared Error Loss (SEL), perform well generally but can be outperformed by tailored loss functions for percentile-based classifications.
  • Loss functions penalizing classification errors are more effective for identifying top (e.g., upper 10%) or bottom performers.
  • The proposed unified framework facilitates robust comparison of different ranking approaches.
  • Data-analytic performance summaries are crucial, as even optimal rank estimates can be unreliable in practice.

Conclusions:

  • Hierarchical Bayesian models provide a powerful tool for performance evaluation and ranking in complex data settings.
  • Tailoring loss functions to specific goals, such as identifying extreme performers, can significantly improve ranking accuracy.
  • The developed framework offers a systematic approach to selecting and evaluating ranking methods.
  • Reporting data-analytic performance summaries is essential for ensuring the reliability and interpretability of rankings in real-world applications.