Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions01:29

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications01:09

Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications

The concept of therapeutic equivalence (TE) in drugs with multiple indications is complex. A generic drug may be therapeutically equivalent to a brand-name product for one specific indication, but this doesn't necessarily mean it's equivalent for all other indications. Evidence of TE in one patient group and bioequivalence shown in healthy volunteers can support—but not confirm—TE for other indications. However, definitive proof requires individual clinical studies for each indication due to...
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Clinical research in service of clinical medicine: Contexts, practice, methodology and theory of Paul Martini's "clinical proof" - part 4: Adoption, resonance, and a résumé].

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2024
Same author

[Clinical research in service of clinical medicine: Contexts, practice, methodology and theory of Paul Martinís "clinical proof" - part 3: Causally relevant elements of Martini's clinical proof and epistemological remarks].

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2023
Same author

[Clinical research in service of clinical medicine: Contexts, practice, methodolody, and theory of Paul Marini's "clinical proof" - part 1].

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2022
Same author

[Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Regional Deprivation, Disease Characteristics and Relevant Health Care].

Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))·2021
Same author

[Medical Rehabilitation for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Access, Process, and Results - Further Analyses of a Randomised Controlled Trial].

Die Rehabilitation·2021
Same author

[Assessment of Psychosocial Problems in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - Who Uses the Online Version at www.CED-aktiv-werden.de?]

Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

[Evidence-based treatment recommendations--between supposition and knowledge].

Heiner Raspe1

  • 1Institut für Sozialmedizin, Universität und Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck. heiner.raspe@uk-sh.de

Zeitschrift Fur Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen
|July 9, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Assessing medical intervention benefits relies on trial evidence, but this assumes results are practically relevant for patients. The study questions this assumption, highlighting weak foundations in benefit assessment.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Medical research methodology
  • Clinical trial evidence evaluation
  • Health services research

Context:

  • Current medical benefit assessments depend on experimental and observational trial evidence.
  • A core assumption is the practical relevance of published trial results for individual patient care.
  • Several preconditions underpin this assumption, including established nosology and reliable outcome measurement.

Purpose:

  • To identify and discuss preconditions for the assumption that trial results are practically relevant.
  • To critically evaluate the foundational assumptions in medical benefit assessment.
  • To highlight the need for continuous theoretical reflection on evidence-based medicine.

Summary:

  • Medical benefit assessment relies on trial evidence, assuming practical relevance for patient treatment.
  • This assumption is based on preconditions like established nosology, outcome measurement, and statistical aggregation.
  • The study argues these foundations are weak, necessitating ongoing theoretical examination.

Impact:

  • Highlights limitations in current medical benefit assessment practices.
  • Underscores the need for rigorous evaluation of evidence applicability in clinical settings.
  • Promotes critical thinking regarding the translation of research findings to patient care.