Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Use of a Piglet Model for the Study of Anesthetic-induced Developmental Neurotoxicity (AIDN): A Translational Neuroscience Approach
Published on: June 11, 2017
Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of propofol in children
Agnes Rigouzzo1, Frederique Servin, Isabelle Constant
1Department of Anesthesiology, Armand Trousseau Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Insights
The Schnider model best described propofol pharmacokinetics in children, outperforming pediatric models. This suggests its utility for target-controlled infusions in pediatric anesthesia.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Pharmacokinetics
- Pharmacodynamics
Background:
- Optimizing anesthetic drug delivery in pediatric patients requires accurate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models.
- Current pediatric models may not fully capture the complexities of drug behavior in prepubertal children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify the optimal model for describing propofol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in prepubertal children.
- To calculate relevant pharmacodynamic parameters for pediatric anesthesia.
- To validate the chosen model by including postpubertal subjects.
Main Methods:
- Compared four pharmacokinetic models (Kataria, pediatric Marsh, Schüttler, Schnider) for propofol in 16 children (6-12 years) and 13 adults (13-35 years).
- Utilized plasma target-controlled infusion based on established models for induction.
- Analyzed bispectral index (BIS) in relation to predicted propofol concentrations.
Main Results:
- The Schnider model demonstrated the best performance in describing the concentration-effect relationship in children.
- Pooling data revealed puberty as a significant covariate influencing key parameters like kE0 (effect-site equilibration rate constant) and Ce50 (median effect-site concentration for 50% maximal effect).
- Children exhibited shorter time-to-peak effect and higher Ce50 values compared to adults.
Conclusions:
- The Schnider model, typically used for adults, proved superior to existing pediatric models for predicting propofol effects in children.
- This study supports the potential use of the Schnider model for propofol target-controlled infusion in pediatric anesthesia.
- Puberty significantly influences propofol's pharmacodynamic parameters, necessitating model adjustments for different age groups.
Background:
The aim of this study was to identify the best model to describe pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in prepubertal children and therefore to calculate the corresponding pharmacodynamic parameters. In addition, and to confirm our method, a group of postpubertal subjects was also studied.
Methods:
Sixteen children (9.5 yr, range 6-12) and 13 adults (22 yr, range 13-35) were included. Induction was performed by plasma target-controlled infusion of propofol (6 microg/ml) based on the Kataria model in children and on the Schnider model in adults. The relationship of bispectral index to predicted concentrations was studied during induction using the Kataria, pediatric Marsh, Schüttler, and Schnider models in children. Because the best performance was obtained, strangely enough, with the Schnider model, the two groups were pooled to investigate influence of puberty on pharmacodynamic parameters (kE0 [plasma effect-site equilibration rate constant] and Ce50 [effect-site concentration corresponding with 50% of the maximal effect]). The time-to-peak effect was calculated, and the kE0 was determined for the Kataria model (nonlinear mixed-effects modeling; pkpdtools).
Results:
In children, the predicted concentration/effect relationship was best described using the Schnider model. When the whole population was considered, a significant improvement in this model was obtained using puberty as a covariate for kE0 and Ce50. The time to peak effect, Tpeak (median, 0.71 [range, 0.37-1.64] and 1.73 [1.4-2.68] min), and the Ce50 (3.71 [1.88-4.4] and 3.07 [2.95-5.21] microg/ml) were shorter and higher, respectively, in children than in adults. The kE0 linked to the Kataria model was 4.6 [1.4-11] min.
Conclusions:
In children, the predicted concentration/effect relationships were best described using the Schnider model described for adults compared with classic pediatric models. The study suggests that the Schnider model might be useful for propofol target-control infusion in children.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Model Components
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems
