Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026
04:22
Application of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Combined with Intraoperative Microwave Ablation in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis
Published on: March 3, 2023
Radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: assistant techniques for difficult cases
Tatsuo Inoue1, Yasunori Minami, Hobyung Chung
1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Oncology
|July 10, 2010
Summary
Assisted radiofrequency ablation (RFA) techniques are safe and effective for difficult-to-treat nodules, achieving high success rates with minimal complications. Careful monitoring for local tumor progression is recommended.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Radiology
- Oncology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment for various tumors.
- Treating difficult-to-access or visualized nodules with RFA presents challenges.
- Assisted techniques aim to improve RFA efficacy and safety in complex cases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of RFA-assisted techniques for challenging nodule treatments.
- To assess successful treatment rates, early complications, and local tumor progression.
- To determine the expanded indications for RFA in difficult cases.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 341 patients with 535 nodules treated between 1999 and 2009.
- Utilized assisted techniques including artificial pleural effusion, artificial ascites, endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) cooling, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and virtual CT sonography.
- Compared outcomes across different assisted RFA methods.
Main Results:
- Complete ablation achieved in 96% of difficult nodules.
- Artificial effusion, ascites, and ENBD-assisted RFA showed 100% complete response.
- CEUS and CT sonography-assisted RFA had a 95% complete response rate.
- Overall early complication rate was 4.5%, with all patients recovering without invasive treatment.
- Local tumor recurrence rates varied by technique, ranging from 7% to 31%.
Conclusions:
- Assisted RFA techniques are well-tolerated and safe for difficult cases.
- These methods effectively expand the applicability of RFA.
- Ongoing surveillance for local tumor progression is essential after treatment.
