Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Biostatistics: Overview01:20

Biostatistics: Overview

Biostatistics plays a crucial role in understanding and analyzing data in healthcare and biology. Biostatisticians conduct experiments, gather evidence, and draw meaningful conclusions using statistical methods and techniques. Different variables form the foundation of biostatistical analysis, allowing researchers to understand and interpret data effectively. These variables are classified into different types, each serving a specific purpose in statistical analysis.
Discrete variables are...
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effectiveness of CPAP vs. Noninvasive Ventilation Based on Disease Severity in Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome and Concomitant Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Archivos de bronconeumologia·2022
Same author

Telemedicine Strategy to Rescue CPAP Therapy in Sleep Apnea Patients with Low Treatment Adherence: A Pilot Study.

Journal of clinical medicine·2021
Same author

[New guidelines for GACETA SANITARIA. Improving the quality and transfer of scientific knowledge].

Gaceta sanitaria·2020
Same author

Long-term Noninvasive Ventilation in Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome Without Severe OSA: The Pickwick Randomized Controlled Trial.

Chest·2020
Same author

Trends in horizontal inequity in access to public health care services by immigrant condition in Spain (2006-2017).

International journal for equity in health·2019
Same author

Echocardiographic Changes with Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome. Long-Term Pickwick Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2019
Same journal

Correction: Grewal et al. Diversity and Representation in Cardiovascular Research: Evidence Gaps, Emerging Models, and Policy Implications. <i>Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health</i> 2026, <i>23</i>, 241.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2026
Same journal

Drinking Water Quality and Health Risk Assessment in Rural Ghana: Evidence from North-East and North Gonja Districts in the Savannah Region.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2026
Same journal

Physical Activity of University Students During COVID-19 Restrictions: Evidence from Poland.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2026
Same journal

Assessment of Occupational Health and Safety Hazards in Mosquito Control Personnel in North Carolina and Virginia, USA.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2026
Same journal

Association Between Dysfunctional Parenting Practices and Suspected Gaming Disorder Among Japanese Male Junior High School Students: A Cross-Sectional Study of Parental Assessment.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2026
Same journal

A National Virtual Peer Support Group for Women Veterans Living with Breast Cancer: Lessons from the Field.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Bayesian variable selection in cost-effectiveness analysis.

Miguel A Negrín1, Francisco J Vázquez-Polo, María Martel

  • 1Department of Quantitative Methods, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Faculty of Economics, Campus de Tafira, E-35017 Las Palmas de G.C. Canary Islands, Spain. mnegrin@dmc.ulpgc.es

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
|July 10, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study explores Bayesian variable selection methods for medical cost and effectiveness research. It highlights how these methods improve model accuracy by accounting for uncertainty in covariate selection.

Keywords:
BICBayesian analysisFractional Bayes FactorIntrinsic Bayes Factorcost-effectivenesssubgroup analysisvariable selection

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Decision Making

Background:

  • Linear regression models are standard for analyzing medical treatment cost and effectiveness.
  • These models often incorporate sociodemographic and clinical variables, alongside treatment indicators.
  • Current practices typically involve estimating a single model, overlooking model selection uncertainty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate four Bayesian variable selection methods for medical cost-effectiveness analysis.
  • To estimate covariate inclusion probabilities within a Bayesian framework.
  • To enhance the accuracy of cost-effectiveness models by addressing model uncertainty.

Main Methods:

  • Application of four distinct Bayesian variable selection techniques.
  • Estimation of covariate inclusion probabilities conditional on observed data.
  • Utilizing Bayesian model averaging for robust analysis.

Main Results:

  • Bayesian variable selection methods provide a framework for quantifying uncertainty in model selection.
  • Inclusion probabilities offer insights into the relevance of different covariates.
  • These methods facilitate more reliable estimation of incremental cost and effectiveness.

Conclusions:

  • Bayesian variable selection offers a superior approach to traditional single-model estimation in cost-effectiveness studies.
  • Accounting for model uncertainty leads to more robust and interpretable results.
  • Variable selection aids in subgroup analysis and precise estimation of treatment impacts.