Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Does off-pump coronary artery revascularization improve the long-term survival in patients with ventricular
Saina Attaran1, Matthew Shaw, Laura Bond
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L14 3PE, UK. saina.attaran@kcl.ac.uk
Insights
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) offers shorter recovery but does not significantly improve survival rates compared to on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCAB) in patients with poor left ventricular function.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Cardiac Surgery Outcomes
- Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Background:
- On-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCAB) poses risks for patients with ejection fraction <30%.
- Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) is proposed as a safer alternative, but long-term survival data are limited.
- This study compares ONCAB and OPCAB outcomes in patients with severely impaired left ventricular function.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on patients with poor left ventricular function.
- To compare mid- and long-term survival rates between ONCAB and OPCAB.
- To evaluate postoperative complications and resource utilization in both groups.
Main Methods:
- A 10-year retrospective study of 934 patients with ejection fraction <30% undergoing isolated first-time coronary artery bypass graft.
- Patients were divided into ONCAB (n=528) and OPCAB (n=406) groups.
- Outcomes including complications, mortality, and survival rates were compared after adjusting for preoperative characteristics.
Main Results:
- OPCAB patients had shorter intensive care unit and hospital stays, and lower wound infection rates.
- Postoperative complications, including stroke and perioperative myocardial infarction (MI), were comparable, with MI lower in OPCAB.
- In-hospital mortality, mid-term (5-year), and long-term (10-year) survival rates were similar between groups, despite a higher re-intervention rate in OPCAB.
Conclusions:
- OPCAB does not significantly improve in-hospital mortality or long-term survival compared to ONCAB in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
- Similar outcomes are achievable with adequate myocardial protection during ONCAB and complete revascularization during OPCAB.
- While OPCAB offers some short-term benefits, long-term survival remains comparable between the two techniques.
Objectives:
Coronary artery revascularization with cardiopulmonary bypass (ONCAB) has been reported to carry several risks for patients with poor left ventricular (LV) function (ejection fraction <30%). Off-pump CABG (OPCAB) has been proposed to result in a better outcome, but mid- and long-term survival rates have never been compared. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on this group of patients.
Methods:
In a 10-year period, a total of 934 patients with poor LV function undergoing isolated first-time coronary artery bypass graft were studied. They were divided into two groups, the ONCAB group, with 528 patients, and the OPCAB group with 406 patients. The EuroSCORE was significantly higher in the OPCAB group (P=0.049). After adjusting for the preoperative characteristics, postoperative complications, in-hospital mortality, mid-term survival rate (five years), and long-term survival rate (10 years) were compared.
Results:
The average number of grafts was 3.7 in the ONCAB group and 3.1 in the OPCAB group (P<0.001). Postoperative complications of ONCAB and OPCAB groups such as; atrial fibrillation (29.6% vs. 28.6%), renal failure (9.3% vs. 9.6%), stroke (2.3% vs. 0.7%), and perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) (3.8% vs. 2.0%), were comparable between groups. Length of intensive care unit stay, hospital stay and ventilation time were considerably shorter in the OPCAB group (P<0.05). The incidence of wound infection was also lower in the OPCAB patients (P<0.05). After adjusting for the preoperative characteristics the incidence of most postoperative complications remained the same between the two groups, except for MI, which was lower in the OPCABs (P<0.04). Despite a lower number of proximal anastomoses in the OPCAB patients, the rate of stroke remained the same between the OPCAB and ONCAB patients (0.09% vs. 1.6%). In-hospital mortality was higher in ONCAB compared to OPCAB (7.8% vs. 5.7%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.21). Likewise, mid-term and long-term survival rates were similar even with matched preoperative characteristics. However, re-intervention rate was found to be higher in the OPCABs (P<0.001).
Conclusions:
Despite the reported benefits of OPCAB, there was no significant influence on the in-hospital mortality, mid-term survival or long-term survival in patients with LV dysfunction. With adequate myocardial protection in ONCAB and complete revascularization in OPCAB, similar results are achievable.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
