Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...

Blinding

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.

Clinical Trials

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

Hazard Ratio

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Effects of a postpartum depression intervention: subgroup analyses from a cluster randomized trial.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026

Same author

Correction: Randomization in the age of platform trials: unexplored challenges and some potential solutions.

BMC medical research methodology·2026

Same author

Pooled randomised QUARTET trials assessing effectiveness of a single pill for hypertension.

Open heart·2025

Same author

Randomization in the age of platform trials: unexplored challenges and some potential solutions.

BMC medical research methodology·2025

Same author

Allocation Predictability of Individual Assignments in Restricted Randomization Designs for Two-Arm Equal Allocation Trials.

Statistics in medicine·2025

Same author

Correction: Temporal changes in the systemic concentrations of retinoids in pregnant and postpartum women.

PloS one·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

Step-forward randomization in multicenter emergency treatment clinical trials.

Wenle Zhao¹, Jody Ciolino, Yuko Palesch

¹Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. zhaow@musc.edu

Academic Emergency Medicine : Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

|July 14, 2010

Summary

A novel step-forward randomization method ensures immediate treatment assignment readiness in multicenter clinical trials. This approach balances treatment groups and covariate distributions effectively for emergency treatments.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

Area of Science:

Clinical Trials Methodology
Biostatistics
Neurology

Background:

Multicenter clinical trials, especially for emergency treatments, require robust randomization methods.
Existing methods may face challenges in ensuring immediate treatment assignment and maintaining balance.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce and evaluate a new centralized step-forward randomization method for multicenter emergency treatment trials.
To ensure timely treatment assignment and effective control over treatment balance and covariate distributions.

Main Methods:

A centralized step-forward randomization technique where the next subject's randomization occurs immediately after current subject enrollment.
Implementation and procedural discussion within two National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-funded acute stroke trials (one double-blinded, one open-labeled).

Main Results:

The step-forward method ensures treatment assignment is ready at enrollment.
Effective control of treatment assignment balance and covariate distributions was achieved.
Practical implementation in acute stroke trials demonstrated feasibility.

Conclusions:

The step-forward randomization method is a viable and effective approach for multicenter emergency treatment trials.
It offers advantages in real-time assignment readiness and statistical balance.
Experience from acute stroke trials provides insights into its strengths and limitations.