Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Through-the-Wall Blood Sampling Method to Minimize Sleep Disruption in Clinical Settings
Published on: June 13, 2025
Clinical use of unfractionated heparin therapy in children: time for change?
Fiona Newall1, Vera Ignjatovic, Linda Johnston
1Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia. fiona.newall@rch.org.au
Insights
Pediatric unfractionated heparin (UFH) management requires new guidelines. Current adult-based recommendations, using protamine titration or anti-Xa assays, do not provide safe or effective UFH ranges in children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric pharmacology
- Thrombosis and hemostasis
- Clinical trial analysis
Background:
- Pediatric unfractionated heparin (UFH) dosing relies on adult data, leading to suboptimal outcomes.
- There is a lack of specific UFH concentration and effect data in pediatric populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine UFH concentration in children.
- To correlate UFH concentration with measures of UFH effect.
- To evaluate the appropriateness of current pediatric UFH therapeutic ranges.
Main Methods:
- First study to measure UFH concentration in children.
- Correlated protamine titration (concentration) with activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), anti-Xa assay, and thrombin clotting time (effect).
Main Results:
- Correlation coefficients found between protamine titration and APTT, anti-Xa, and thrombin clotting time were 0.59, 0.46, and 0.52, respectively.
- A protamine titration of 0.2-0.4 iu/ml in children corresponded to an anti-Xa assay range of 0.17-0.85 iu/ml, not the 0.35-0.7 iu/ml range.
- Using anti-Xa or protamine titration to set APTT ranges resulted in upper limits exceeding 200 s.
Conclusions:
- Existing adult-derived UFH therapeutic ranges are not equivalent or appropriate for pediatric use.
- Current pediatric clinical guidelines for UFH management lack sufficient evidence.
- Urgent re-evaluation of UFH management strategies in children is necessary.
Abstract:
Paediatric recommendations for unfractionated heparin (UFH) management are extrapolated from adult trials, a practice that may contribute to the inferior UFH-related outcomes in children compared to adults. This is the first study to determine UFH concentration in a population of children and correlated UFH concentration with measures of UFH effect. Correlation coefficients between protamine titration (concentration) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), anti- activated factor X (Xa) assay and thrombin clotting time (effect) were 0·59, 0·46 and 0·52 respectively. A protamine titration level of 0·2-0·4 iu/ml in children was not equivalent to an anti-Xa assay of 0·35-0·7 iu/ml but to an anti-Xa assay 0·17-0·85 iu/ml. In addition, use of the anti-Xa or protamine titration assays to establish an APTT therapeutic range resulted in upper limits of APTT ranges exceeding 200 s. Existing methods for determining therapeutic ranges for UFH in adult populations do not produce equivalent ranges in children. As a result, paediatric clinical guidelines that state a therapeutic range for UFH can be determined using a protamine titration assay of 0·2–0·4 iu/ml or an anti-Xa assay of 0·35-0·7 iu/ml are not based on appropriate evidence. There is an urgent need for change in our approach to the use of UFH in children.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
