Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Three-dimensional reconstruction of porous polymer films from FIB-SEM nanotomography data using random forests.

Journal of microscopy·2021
Same author

3D high spatial resolution visualisation and quantification of interconnectivity in polymer films.

International journal of pharmaceutics·2020
Same author

Graphene oxide/waterborne polyurethane nanocoatings: effects of graphene oxide content on performance properties.

Journal of coatings technology and research·2020
Same author

5-aminolaevulinic acid nanoemulsion is more effective than methyl-5-aminolaevulinate in daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: a nonsponsored randomized double-blind multicentre trial.

The British journal of dermatology·2018
Same author

Can a brief psychological intervention improve oral health behaviour? A randomised controlled trial.

BMC oral health·2018
Same author

Single particle raster image analysis of diffusion for particle mixtures.

Journal of microscopy·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Photobleaching Assays (FRAP & FLIP) to Measure Chromatin Protein Dynamics in Living Embryonic Stem Cells
09:18

Photobleaching Assays (FRAP & FLIP) to Measure Chromatin Protein Dynamics in Living Embryonic Stem Cells

Published on: June 29, 2011

Pixel-based analysis of FRAP data with a general initial bleaching profile.

J K Jonasson1, J Hagman, N Lorén

  • 1Mathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology and the University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. jennya@chalmers.se

Journal of Microscopy
|July 16, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new Monotone profile method accurately estimates diffusion coefficients from fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) data, even with non-Gaussian profiles. The Gaussian profile method is faster but less accurate for certain profiles.

More Related Videos

Zygotic Fluorescence Recovery After Photo-bleaching Analysis for Chromatin Looseness That Allows Full-term Development
10:30

Zygotic Fluorescence Recovery After Photo-bleaching Analysis for Chromatin Looseness That Allows Full-term Development

Published on: June 12, 2018

Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching of Yellow Fluorescent Protein Tagged p62 in Aggresome-like Induced Structures
12:58

Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching of Yellow Fluorescent Protein Tagged p62 in Aggresome-like Induced Structures

Published on: March 26, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Photobleaching Assays (FRAP & FLIP) to Measure Chromatin Protein Dynamics in Living Embryonic Stem Cells
09:18

Photobleaching Assays (FRAP & FLIP) to Measure Chromatin Protein Dynamics in Living Embryonic Stem Cells

Published on: June 29, 2011

Zygotic Fluorescence Recovery After Photo-bleaching Analysis for Chromatin Looseness That Allows Full-term Development
10:30

Zygotic Fluorescence Recovery After Photo-bleaching Analysis for Chromatin Looseness That Allows Full-term Development

Published on: June 12, 2018

Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching of Yellow Fluorescent Protein Tagged p62 in Aggresome-like Induced Structures
12:58

Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching of Yellow Fluorescent Protein Tagged p62 in Aggresome-like Induced Structures

Published on: March 26, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Polymer Science
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) is a key technique for measuring molecular diffusion.
  • Previous methods, like the Gaussian profile method, rely on assumptions about the initial photobleaching profile.
  • Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) is commonly used for FRAP experiments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce an extended maximum likelihood framework (Monotone profile method) for diffusion coefficient estimation.
  • To accommodate general, non-decreasing initial bleaching profiles and Poisson noise.
  • To compare the accuracy and limitations of the Monotone and Gaussian profile methods.

Main Methods:

  • Developed the Monotone profile method within a pixel-based maximum likelihood framework.
  • Applied both Monotone and Gaussian profile methods to FRAP data of swelling superabsorbent polymers (SAP).
  • Validated results using NMR diffusometry and simulated data.

Main Results:

  • The Monotone profile method demonstrated accuracy across various initial bleaching profiles (step-like to Gaussian).
  • The Gaussian profile method showed sufficient accuracy for most profiles but underestimated diffusion for step-like profiles.
  • The Monotone method is computationally intensive, while the Gaussian method is faster but less universally accurate.

Conclusions:

  • The Monotone profile method offers improved accuracy for diffusion coefficient estimation in FRAP experiments.
  • A diagnostic plot is provided to guide the selection between Gaussian and Monotone methods.
  • Understanding initial bleaching profile characteristics is crucial for accurate diffusion measurements.