The challenge of selecting the 'right' in vivo oncology pharmacology model

Brant Firestone1

  • 1Oncology Pharmacology, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Inc., 250 Massachusetts Aveune, Cambridge, MA 02135, USA. brant.firestone@novartis.com

Insights

Preclinical cancer models often fail to predict drug effectiveness in humans. Selecting hypothesis-driven models is crucial for improving cancer drug discovery and clinical translation.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology
  • Translational Research

Background:

  • Non-clinical cancer pharmacology models have historically shown poor predictive value for clinical outcomes.
  • Numerous drugs demonstrating anti-tumor responses in preclinical animal models have subsequently failed in clinical trials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the challenge of improving the translation of preclinical cancer models to clinical settings.
  • To emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate models for hypothesis-driven research in targeted drug discovery.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of various model systems employed in preclinical cancer drug discovery.
  • Focus on criteria for selecting models that align with specific scientific questions.

Main Results:

  • Analysis of current preclinical cancer model systems.
  • Identification of strategies for enhancing the predictive accuracy of these models.

Conclusions:

  • The selection of cancer models tailored to specific, hypothesis-driven scientific questions is critical.
  • Improving model selection can enhance the translation of preclinical findings to clinical success in targeted cancer therapy.

Related Concept Videos

Mouse Models of Cancer Study02:43

Mouse Models of Cancer Study

Mice have long served as models for studying human biology and pathology because of their phylogenetic and physiological similarity with humans. They are also easy to maintain and breed in the laboratory, and hence, many inbred strains are now available for research. Studies on mice have contributed immeasurably to our understanding of cancer biology.
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF).
Drug Discovery: Overview01:26

Drug Discovery: Overview

Drug discovery is a multifaceted process involving extensive screening, testing, and optimization of lead compounds to identify potential new drugs for therapeutic use. It combines several approaches, including screening large numbers of natural products, chemical modification of known active molecules, identification of new drug targets, and rational design based on biological mechanisms and drug-receptor structure. These approaches are carried out in both academic research laboratories and...