Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients hospitalized for heart failure with chronically reduced left
Norman C Wang1, Jonathan P Piccini, Marvin A Konstam
1University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Insights
Patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) hospitalized for heart failure (HF) had similar mortality but higher HF rehospitalization rates. Further research should explore ICD care optimization and implantation timing for HF patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Worsening heart failure (HF) in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 40%) is a significant clinical challenge.
- The role of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in this population during acute HF exacerbations requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the association between ICD status at hospitalization for worsening HF and post-discharge outcomes.
- To compare all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization rates in patients with and without an ICD.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 4133 patients hospitalized for HF with LVEF ≤ 40% from the EVEREST registry.
- Comparison of outcomes between patients with an ICD (n=600) and those without an electrophysiological device (n=3102).
- Median follow-up of 300 days, with adjusted analyses for multiple variables.
Main Results:
- Unadjusted analysis showed higher mortality and HF rehospitalization in the ICD group.
- After adjustment, all-cause mortality rates were similar between groups (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.83-1.22).
- Adjusted analyses revealed significantly higher rates of HF rehospitalization in the ICD group (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.14-1.60).
Conclusions:
- In patients with reduced LVEF, having an ICD at the time of HF hospitalization was linked to similar mortality but increased HF rehospitalization.
- Findings suggest a need to investigate optimizing care for existing ICD patients and the role of ICD implantation during or after HF hospitalization.
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to investigate the association between implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) status at the time of hospitalization for worsening heart failure (HF) with postdischarge events in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. We conducted an analysis of 4133 patients hospitalized for HF with left ventricular ejection fraction 40% or less in EVEREST. The final analysis included patients without an electrophysiological device (n = 3102) and those with an ICD (n = 600) at the time of enrollment. During a median follow-up of 300 days, all-cause mortality was 22.9% in the no device group and 35.2% in the ICD group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-1.89). Rehospitalization for HF was 27.0% in the no device group and 46.8% in the ICD group (HR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.92-2.52). After adjustment for multiple variables, the rates for all-cause mortality were similar (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.83-1.22), but the ICD group had elevated rates of HF hospitalizations compared with the no device group (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.14-1.60). In patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, an ICD at presentation for hospitalization for worsening HF was associated with similar rates of death but higher rates of rehospitalization for HF. Given our findings, further studies should investigate optimization of care in patients already implanted with an ICD as well as the role of ICD implantation during or soon after hospitalization for HF in patients not yet implanted.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents

