Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quality of life domains revised by people with multiple sclerosis and healthcare professionals for adaptive measure development.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Summary of Research: Cognition and Employment Status of People with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Treated with Cladribine Tablets: Two-Year CLARIFY-MS Study.

Neurology and therapy·2026
Same author

Correction: Stability in Cognition and Employment in People with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Treated with Cladribine Tablets: Two‑year Phase IV CLARIFY‑MS Study.

Neurology and therapy·2026
Same author

Needs, experiences, and knowledge of people with primary progressive multiple sclerosis: a scoping review.

Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology·2026
Same author

Communication competences of multiple sclerosis neurologists during advance care planning conversations: A multi-observer study.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Stability in Cognition and Employment in People with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Treated with Cladribine Tablets: Two-year Phase IV CLARIFY-MS Study.

Neurology and therapy·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
08:53

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke

Published on: June 6, 2025

Methodological aspects of randomized controlled trials on cognitive interventions.

Alessandra Solari1

  • 1Unit of Neuroepidemiology, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C. Besta, Milan, Italy. solari@istituto-besta.it

Neurological Sciences : Official Journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology
|July 17, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Methodological challenges in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for multiple sclerosis cognitive interventions were assessed. Study quality was generally low, with issues in population selection and sample size, particularly in rehabilitation trials.

More Related Videos

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
08:53

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke

Published on: June 6, 2025

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Rehabilitation Science

Background:

  • Multiple sclerosis (MS) cognitive impairments necessitate effective interventions.
  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are crucial for evaluating intervention efficacy.
  • Methodological rigor in MS intervention RCTs requires careful examination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess methodological challenges in RCTs for cognitive interventions in multiple sclerosis.
  • To identify specific problems within rehabilitation trials for MS.
  • To evaluate the quality of existing RCTs on cognitive and rehabilitation interventions for MS.

Main Methods:

  • A bibliographic search was conducted to identify relevant RCTs.
  • Selected RCTs were evaluated using five methodological quality criteria.
  • Criteria included population description, allocation concealment, masking, outcome measures, and analysis.

Main Results:

  • Twelve RCTs published between 1996 and 2010 were identified (5 drug therapy, 7 rehabilitation).
  • Overall study quality was low, with frequent limitations in target population selection and small sample sizes.
  • No clear improvement in methodological quality was observed in recent studies; rehabilitation trials faced challenges in intervention definition and reproducibility.

Conclusions:

  • Significant methodological challenges persist in RCTs for cognitive interventions in multiple sclerosis.
  • Low study quality and specific issues in rehabilitation trials hinder reliable evidence synthesis.
  • Future research requires improved methodological standards for effective MS intervention evaluation.