Related Experiment Videos
Mandibular second premolar extraction--postretention evaluation of stability and relapse
1Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.
The Angle Orthodontist
|January 1, 1991
Summary
Long-term orthodontic stability was evaluated after mandibular second premolar extraction. Early or late extraction showed no significant difference in stability, though arch dimensions decreased and incisor irregularity increased over time.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Orthodontics
- Dental Arch Stability
Background:
- Mandibular second premolar extraction is a common orthodontic procedure.
- Assessing long-term stability after this treatment is crucial for clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term stability of orthodontic treatment involving mandibular second premolar extraction.
- To compare stability between early (mixed dentition) and late (permanent dentition) extraction timing.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of dental casts and cephalometric radiographs from 46 patients over a minimum 10-year postretention period.
- Comparison of treatment outcomes based on extraction timing (early vs. late).
- Regrouping patients based on postretention incisor irregularity for cephalometric analysis.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in long-term stability was found between early and late mandibular second premolar extraction groups.
- Arch length and width showed a decrease over time.
- Incisor irregularity increased throughout the postretention period.
- Cephalometric differences were noted between minimally and moderately to severely crowded groups postretention.
Conclusions:
- Extraction timing of mandibular second premolars does not appear to influence long-term orthodontic stability.
- Progressive changes like arch dimension reduction and increased incisor irregularity occur post-treatment.
- Further research is needed to identify predictors for long-term stability.