Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Intrathecal Injection of Newborn Mouse for Genome Editing and Drug Delivery
Published on: March 8, 2024
Intrathecal clonidine decreases propofol sedation requirements during spinal anesthesia in infants
Yatindra K Batra1, Sondekoppam V Rakesh, Nidhi B Panda
1Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. ykbatra@glide.net.in
Insights
Intrathecal clonidine or clonidine-fentanyl combinations significantly reduce propofol sedation requirements in infants undergoing surgery. Fentanyl alone did not significantly alter propofol needs, highlighting clonidine
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Anesthesiology
- Pharmacology
- Surgical Sedation
Background:
- Propofol is a common agent for procedural sedation in pediatric patients undergoing lumbar puncture and spinal anesthesia.
- Intrathecal clonidine and fentanyl are used as adjuvants to prolong spinal anesthesia and provide postoperative analgesia.
- This study investigated the impact of intrathecal clonidine and fentanyl on propofol requirements in infants undergoing lower abdominal surgery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of intrathecal clonidine and fentanyl on the intraoperative propofol sedation requirement in infants undergoing spinal anesthesia.
- To compare the propofol infusion rates needed when bupivacaine is combined with clonidine, fentanyl, or both, versus bupivacaine alone.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, randomized, double-blind study involving 65 ASA I infants undergoing elective lower abdominal surgery.
- Infants were assigned to four groups receiving bupivacaine alone, or bupivacaine with clonidine, fentanyl, or both.
- Propofol was administered for sedation, with requirements assessed via infusion rates and sedation/reactivity scores.
Main Results:
- The mean propofol infusion requirement was significantly reduced in infants who received intrathecal clonidine (16.7 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) or clonidine-fentanyl combination (14.8 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) compared to bupivacaine alone (35.5 microg kg(-1) min(-1)).
- Intrathecal fentanyl alone (33.4 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) did not significantly alter propofol requirements compared to bupivacaine alone.
- Higher sedation and reactivity scores were observed in the clonidine-containing groups.
Conclusions:
- Intrathecal adjuvants, particularly clonidine, significantly decrease the need for propofol sedation during pediatric spinal anesthesia.
- The combination of clonidine and fentanyl offers a similar reduction in propofol requirements as clonidine alone.
- Fentanyl alone as an intrathecal adjuvant does not significantly impact propofol sedation needs in this population.
Background:
Propofol is a popular agent for providing procedural sedation in pediatric population during lumbar puncture and spinal anesthesia. Adjuvants like clonidine and fentanyl are administered intrathecally to prolong the duration of spinal anesthesia and to provide postoperative analgesia. We studied the propofol requirement after intrathecal administration of clonidine or fentanyl in infants undergoing lower abdominal surgeries.
Methods:
Sixty-five ASA I infants undergoing elective lower abdominal surgery under spinal anesthesia were assigned into four groups in this prospective randomized double-blinded study. Group B received bupivacaine based on body weight (<5 kg = 0.5 mg kg(-1); 5-10 kg = 0.4 mg kg(-1)). Group BC received 1 microg kg(-1) of clonidine with bupivacaine, group BF received 1 microg kg(-1) of fentanyl with bupivacaine, and patients in group BCF received 1 microg kg(-1) each of clonidine and fentanyl with bupivacaine. A bolus of 2-3 mg kg(-1) of propofol bolus was administered for lumbar puncture. Sedation was assessed using a six-point sedation score (0-5) and a five-point reactivity score (0-4) which was based on a behavioral score. After achieving a sedation and reactivity score of 3-4, the patients were placed lateral in knee chest position and lumbar puncture performed and test drug administered. Further intraoperative sedation was maintained with an infusion of 25-50 microg kg(-1) min(-1) of propofol infusion.
Results:
The mean +/- SD infusion requirement of propofol decreased from 35.5 +/- 4.5 in group B to 33.4 +/- 5.4 microg kg(-1) min(-1) in group BF and further decreased to 16.7 +/- 6.2 microg kg(-1) min(-1) and 14.8 +/- 4.9 microg kg(-1) min(-1) in group BC and BCF, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between BC and BCF groups. The mean sedation and reactivity scores were higher in groups BC and BCF when compared to groups B and BF.
Conclusion:
Our study show that the requirement of propofol sedation reduces with intrathecal adjuvants. The reduction was significant with the addition of clonidine and clonidine-fentanyl combination as opposed to bupivacaine alone or with fentanyl. There was no significant difference in propofol infusion requirement with the use of bupivacaine alone or with fentanyl.
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Drug Delivery: Parenteral Route
There are three primary parenteral routes: intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), and subcutaneous (SC). The IV route introduces the drug directly into the bloodstream, ensuring immediate action. The IM route...
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics