Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Combining Solid-state and Solution-based Techniques: Synthesis and Reactivity of Chalcogenidoplumbates(II or IV)
Published on: December 29, 2016
Interactions of chelating agents with Pb-goethite at the solid-liquid interface: Pb extraction and re-adsorption
Theo C M Yip1, Daniel C W Tsang, Irene M C Lo
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China. cmtheo@ust.hk
Ethylenediamine disuccinate (EDDS) is a biodegradable alternative to EDTA for lead extraction from soil. Differences in their zwitterionic structures influence pH-dependent lead extraction and re-adsorption efficiencies.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Chemistry
- Soil Science
- Green Chemistry
Background:
- Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is effective for soil remediation but poses environmental risks due to its persistence and toxicity.
- Biodegradable alternatives like [S,S]-ethylenediamine disuccinate ([S,S]-EDDS) are being explored for safer soil remediation.
- Understanding the mechanisms of lead (Pb) extraction by these chelating agents is crucial for optimizing soil cleanup strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficiency of [S,S]-EDDS and EDTA in extracting lead (Pb) from goethite.
- To investigate the pH-dependent mechanisms governing Pb extraction by EDDS and EDTA at the solid-liquid interface.
- To elucidate the role of zwitterionic structures in the performance of these chelating agents.
Main Methods:
- Batch experiments were conducted to quantify Pb extraction by EDDS and EDTA from goethite.
- Attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared (ATR/FT-IR) spectroscopy was employed to analyze surface interactions.
- Experiments were performed across a range of pH values and reaction times to assess environmental factors.
Main Results:
- Pb extraction was pH-dependent for both EDDS and EDTA, with optimal conditions differing between the two.
- EDTA showed higher Pb extraction efficiency under mildly acidic conditions, while EDDS performed better under mildly alkaline conditions.
- EDTA exhibited greater Pb re-adsorption compared to EDDS, linked to altered goethite properties and iron dissolution.
Conclusions:
- The distinct zwitterionic properties of EDDS and EDTA significantly influence their Pb extraction and re-adsorption behavior.
- EDDS offers a potentially more environmentally benign option for lead remediation due to lower re-adsorption.
- Further research into the structural-functional relationships of chelating agents is warranted for sustainable soil remediation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Extraction: Advanced Methods
Complexation Equilibria: The Chelate Effect
Colloidal precipitates
Microbial Bioremediation of Uranium
Precipitation and Co-precipitation
Microbial Leaching

