Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II links ER stress with Fas and mitochondrial apoptosis pathways.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2009
Same author

Cripto-1 overexpression is involved in the tumorigenesis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BMC cancer·2009
Same author

Range of motion and orientation of the lumbar facet joints in vivo.

Spine·2009
Same author

[Silencing of COX-2 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells with a shRNAmir lentivirus vector].

Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University·2009
Same author

The risk of melamine-induced nephrolithiasis in young children starts at a lower intake level than recommended by the WHO.

Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)·2009
Same author

Adult scoliosis in patients over sixty-five years of age: outcomes of operative versus nonoperative treatment at a minimum two-year follow-up.

Spine·2009

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

A group sequential type design for three-arm non-inferiority trials with binary endpoints.

Gang Li1, Shan Gao

  • 1GlaxoSmithKline, 1250 S. Collegeville Rd, Collegeville, PA 19426, USA. gang.6.li@gsk.com

Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
|July 21, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a group sequential design for three-arm non-inferiority trials, optimizing allocation ratios for effect preservation tests. The proposed design shows improved performance over fixed sample designs, especially with placebo response rate uncertainties.

More Related Videos

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Pharmaceutical Research

Background:

  • The three-arm design (test treatment, active control, placebo) is standard for non-inferiority trials when placebo use is ethical.
  • Hierarchical testing and optimal allocation are crucial for robust trial outcomes.
  • Group sequential designs offer adaptive advantages over fixed sample designs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a group sequential design for three-arm non-inferiority trials.
  • To establish a hierarchical testing procedure using the closed testing principle.
  • To derive optimal allocation ratios for the effect preservation test.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the closed testing principle for hierarchical multiple comparisons.
  • Derived explicit formulas for optimal allocation ratios in effect preservation tests.
  • Developed a group sequential design accommodating the hierarchical testing procedure.
  • Employed Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate performance under estimated null hypothesis response rates.

Main Results:

  • The proposed group sequential design naturally integrates the hierarchical testing procedure.
  • Optimal allocation ratios were explicitly derived for the effect preservation test.
  • Simulations demonstrated the sequential effect preservation test's performance.
  • The design showed superior operating characteristics compared to fixed sample designs when placebo response rates were uncertain.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed group sequential design enhances non-inferiority trials with a three-arm structure.
  • It provides a robust framework for hierarchical testing and effect preservation.
  • This adaptive approach is particularly beneficial when placebo response rates are uncertain.