Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026
11:51
Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
Using the lessons of behavioral economics to design more effective pay-for-performance programs
Ateev Mehrotra1, Melony E S Sorbero, Cheryl L Damberg
1RAND Health, 4570 Fifth Ave, Ste 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2665, USA. mehrotra@rand.org
The American Journal of Managed Care
|July 22, 2010
Summary
Behavioral economics offers insights to enhance pay-for-performance (P4P) programs. Applying these principles can improve P4P design and effectiveness in healthcare settings.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Economics
- Health Services Research
- Incentive Design
Background:
- Pay-for-performance (P4P) programs are widely adopted in healthcare.
- Existing P4P initiatives have shown limited impact on healthcare quality and outcomes.
- Understanding psychological responses to incentives is crucial for program effectiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify design improvements for P4P programs based on behavioral economics principles.
- To explore how incentive structures influence healthcare provider behavior.
- To mitigate potential adverse consequences of P4P incentives.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of behavioral economics literature.
- Analysis of incentive design strategies, including payment frequency and type.
- Identification of methods to address unintended consequences of P4P.
Main Results:
- Behavioral economics offers 7 strategies to improve P4P program design.
- P4P programs can have unintended negative effects if not carefully designed.
- Optimized incentive structures can enhance the effectiveness of P4P programs.
Conclusions:
- Behavioral economics principles can significantly improve healthcare P4P program design.
- Empirical evidence is needed to validate the enhanced effectiveness of these P4P programs.
- Future research should focus on testing improved P4P designs in real-world healthcare settings.
Related Concept Videos
01:21Behavior Modification
Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
01:06Law of Effect
B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...
01:28Behaviorism
The field of behaviorism was pioneered by figures such as Ivan Pavlov, John B. Watson, and B.F. Skinner fundamentally shifted the focus of psychology to the observable and controllable aspects of human and animal behavior. This shift marked a critical evolution in the discipline, emphasizing scientific rigor and experimental methodology.
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...
01:21Operant Conditioning
Operant conditioning, a key concept in behavioral psychology, involves using reinforcement and punishment to alter the likelihood of a behavior being repeated. B.F. introduced this type of conditioning. Skinner focused on voluntary behaviors and the consequences that follow them, influencing whether these behaviors will be strengthened or diminished.
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
01:18Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation
Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between intrinsic and...
The theory differentiates between intrinsic and...
01:08Timing and Consequences on Behavior
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...