Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
Scientific Laws and Theories02:31

Scientific Laws and Theories

Scientific Laws
Psychology as a Science01:13

Psychology as a Science

Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Generative artificial intelligence in nursing care research: Applications across the research process.

Enfermeria clinica·2026
Same journal

Development of the Paediatric Nursing specialty in Spain: advances, challenges and future perspectives.

Enfermeria clinica·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence in the teaching practice of nursing professionals: opportunities, applications, and challenges.

Enfermeria clinica·2026
Same journal

Mental health in nursing: a perspective from psychosocial risks.

Enfermeria clinica·2026
Same journal

Nursing care in a pediatric patient with Berlin Heart Excor® ventricular assist device: A case report.

Enfermeria clinica·2026
Same journal

Self-perceived risk of falls in hospitalised adults: A comparison with nursing assessment.

Enfermeria clinica·2026
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Single Wavelength Shadow Imaging of Caenorhabditis elegans Locomotion Including Force Estimates
08:41

Single Wavelength Shadow Imaging of Caenorhabditis elegans Locomotion Including Force Estimates

Published on: April 18, 2014

[Science in the shadows].

María Pilar López-Sancho1

  • 1Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales, Madrid, España. pilar@icmm.csic.es

Enfermeria Clinica
|July 22, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Women have made educational gains but remain underrepresented in professorial roles, with fewer than 18% of professors being women. Despite initiatives, their presence in top scientific and leadership positions remains low.

More Related Videos

Safe Experimentation in Optical Levitation of Charged Droplets Using Remote Labs
09:09

Safe Experimentation in Optical Levitation of Charged Droplets Using Remote Labs

Published on: January 10, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Single Wavelength Shadow Imaging of Caenorhabditis elegans Locomotion Including Force Estimates
08:41

Single Wavelength Shadow Imaging of Caenorhabditis elegans Locomotion Including Force Estimates

Published on: April 18, 2014

Safe Experimentation in Optical Levitation of Charged Droplets Using Remote Labs
09:09

Safe Experimentation in Optical Levitation of Charged Droplets Using Remote Labs

Published on: January 10, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Gender Studies
  • History of Science

Context:

  • Historically, women were excluded from centers of knowledge and academia.
  • The concept of 'gender' emerged as an analytical tool in the last century to re-interpret historical facts.
  • Women now earn over half of European university degrees, yet hold less than 18% of professorships.

Purpose:

  • To analyze the persistent underrepresentation of women in scientific and technological fields.
  • To investigate the reasons behind the low progression of women into higher academic and leadership roles.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of initiatives aimed at addressing gender imbalance in science.

Summary:

  • Despite significant progress in women's access to higher education, a substantial gender gap persists in academia.
  • Statistical studies and policy recommendations have not yet rectified the low presence of women in senior scientific positions.
  • The European Commission's 'Women in Science' Unit has documented this ongoing imbalance since 2001.

Impact:

  • Highlights the critical need for further interventions to achieve gender equity in scientific careers.
  • Underscores the societal and economic loss due to underutilization of female talent in research and innovation.
  • Informs future policy development for promoting women's advancement in science and technology.