Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
Individual differences and age effects in a dichotic informational masking paradigm
Frederic L Wightman1, Doris J Kistler, Amanda O'Bryan
1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, 2301 S Third Street, Louisville, Kentucky 40292, USA. fred.wightman@louisville.edu
Children experience significant informational masking from speech noise, unlike adults. This study investigated how contralateral speech maskers affect speech understanding across different age groups, revealing age-dependent effects.
Area of Science:
- Auditory perception
- Speech processing
- Psychoacoustics
Background:
- Informational masking (IM) is a key factor limiting speech understanding in noise.
- Previous research primarily focused on ipsilateral maskers, with less known about contralateral masker effects, especially across development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of contralateral speech maskers on speech understanding in normally-hearing listeners across a wide age range (5-61 years).
- To quantify age-related differences in informational masking (IM) caused by contralateral speech maskers.
Main Methods:
- Participants completed a monaural speech understanding task with ipsilateral speech-spectrum noise.
- Contralateral maskers (modulated noise, male/female speech) were introduced at a fixed level to assess IM.
- Psychometric functions were used to determine the target/masker ratio for 51% correct performance, serving as the baseline threshold.
Main Results:
- Contralateral modulated noise produced no IM across all ages.
- Contralateral speech maskers produced significant IM, with children (5-8 years) showing up to 20 dB, while adults showed only 4 dB.
- Male and female contralateral speech maskers yielded comparable IM, unlike findings with ipsilateral maskers.
Conclusions:
- Contralateral speech maskers significantly impact speech understanding, particularly in young children, indicating developmental differences in auditory processing.
- The mechanisms underlying IM from contralateral and ipsilateral speech maskers may differ, suggesting distinct neural pathways or processing strategies.
- Findings highlight the importance of considering masker location and listener age when assessing speech intelligibility in complex auditory environments.
More Related Videos
05:48Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis
Published on: August 9, 2024
07:34Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013