Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Isolation01:24

DNA Isolation

DNA isolation protocols can be fast and straightforward or complex and time-consuming depending on the type and quality of DNA required for further processing. For example, plasmid DNA extraction is a bit more complicated than genomic DNA extraction because of the need for an appropriate lysis method to separate plasmid DNA from gDNA during isolation. However, for specific applications, such as long-range DNA sequencing that require a good yield of high- quality DNA samples, we need to follow...
Methods to Assess Microbial Communities01:19

Methods to Assess Microbial Communities

Microbial communities, comprising bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotic microorganisms, inhabit diverse ecosystems and play crucial roles in environmental and biological processes. Their diversity is defined by three main parameters: species richness (the number of distinct species), species abundance (the relative quantity of each species), and species evenness (how uniformly individual species are distributed in various locations). These factors together shape the structure and ecological balance...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Animal husbandry and environmental conditions are associated with cefotaxime-resistant Escherichia coli in yard soil in peri-urban Malawi.

PLOS global public health·2026
Same author

Animal husbandry and environmental conditions are associated with cefotaxime-resistant <i>Escherichia coli</i> in yard soil in peri-urban Malawi.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Critical analysis of literature on landfill gas collection efficiency and its application to emissions estimates.

Waste management (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Associations between Water Supply Interruptions and Water Use, Drinking Water Quality, Child Health, and Caregiver Stress in Peri-Urban Malawi.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same author

Evaluation of Fluorochemical Leaching from Lithium-Ion Batteries Under Simulated Solid Waste Landfill Conditions.

Environmental science & technology·2025
Same author

Nationwide Estimate of Volatile Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance (PFAS) Emissions from U.S. Landfills via Landfill Gas.

Environmental science & technology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

Critical evaluation of solid waste sample processing for DNA-based microbial community analysis.

Bryan F Staley1, Pascal E Saikaly, Francis L de Los Reyes

  • 1Environmental Research and Education Foundation, Raleigh, NC 27609, USA. bstaley@erefdn.org

Biodegradation
|July 24, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Landfill microbial community studies are impacted by sample processing. Indirect methods, like using PO₄ buffer, reduce bias and improve accuracy in analyzing Bacteria and Archaea diversity.

More Related Videos

Characterizing Microbiome Dynamics &#8211; Flow Cytometry Based Workflows from Pure Cultures to Natural Communities
09:57

Characterizing Microbiome Dynamics – Flow Cytometry Based Workflows from Pure Cultures to Natural Communities

Published on: July 12, 2018

A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples
07:24

A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples

Published on: December 10, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

Characterizing Microbiome Dynamics &#8211; Flow Cytometry Based Workflows from Pure Cultures to Natural Communities
09:57

Characterizing Microbiome Dynamics – Flow Cytometry Based Workflows from Pure Cultures to Natural Communities

Published on: July 12, 2018

A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples
07:24

A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples

Published on: December 10, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Environmental microbiology
  • Molecular ecology

Background:

  • Landfills are unique microbial ecosystems crucial for global biogeochemical cycles.
  • DNA-based techniques offer high resolution for studying microbial diversity in complex environments like landfills.
  • Sample processing from heterogeneous landfill refuse presents significant challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of seven distinct sample processing methods on Bacteria and Archaea community structure in landfill refuse.
  • To assess the bias introduced by different processing methods using T-RFLP (Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism).
  • To identify optimal methods for accurate microbial diversity analysis in landfill ecosystems.

Main Methods:

  • Decomposed landfill refuse was subjected to seven different sample processing techniques.
  • Bacterial and archaeal community structures were analyzed using T-RFLP.
  • Methodological bias was assessed by measuring microbial richness and comparing community structures via multi-dimensional scaling (MDS).
  • Recovery rates of spiked microbial species (R. albus and M. formicicum) were determined.

Main Results:

  • Direct sample processing methods exhibited the highest bias.
  • Indirect methods, involving removal of cellular material before DNA extraction, were least biased.
  • An indirect method using PO₄ buffer consistently yielded high bacterial and archaeal richness and moderate recovery rates for spiked organisms.
  • Combining multiple processing methods maximized the recovery of less abundant microbial taxa (T-RFs).

Conclusions:

  • Methodological variations in sample processing significantly influence the measured diversity of landfill microbial communities.
  • Differences observed in landfill ecosystem studies may stem from processing techniques rather than inherent refuse heterogeneity or true community divergence.
  • Standardizing sample processing protocols is crucial for reliable comparisons across landfill microbial studies.