Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

18:46
Methods Development for Blood Borne Macrophage Carriage of Nanoformulated Antiretroviral Drugs
Published on: December 9, 2010
A mixed methods and triangulation model for increasing the accuracy of adherence and sexual behaviour data: the
Robert Pool1, Catherine M Montgomery, Neetha S Morar
1Centre for International Health Research (CRESIB), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. robert.pool@cresib.cat
Plos One
|July 27, 2010
Summary
Accurate data collection in HIV research is challenging. This study introduces a mixed-method, triangulation approach to improve adherence and sexual behavior data in microbicide trials, enhancing reliability.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Research
- HIV Prevention Research
- Social Science in Medicine
Background:
- Accurate data on adherence and sexual behavior are critical for HIV-related research, particularly microbicide trials.
- Participant self-reporting is the primary method for collecting such sensitive data, but often lacks a "gold standard" for validation.
- Existing methods for data collection in clinical trials have limitations that can impact accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe and evaluate a mixed-method, triangulation model for improving the accuracy of adherence and sexual behavior data in a multi-center vaginal microbicide clinical trial.
- To address the challenges of collecting reliable data on sensitive topics within the context of clinical research.
- To identify and resolve discrepancies in self-reported data through a comprehensive data collection strategy.
Main Methods:
- A mixed-method approach was employed, integrating quantitative and qualitative data collection techniques.
- Data were gathered from a subsample of 725 women using structured interviews, coital diaries, in-depth interviews, returned gel applicator counts, focus group discussions, and ethnography.
- Two levels of triangulation were implemented: resolving discrepancies with participants and integrating individual data with broader qualitative findings.
Main Results:
- The model successfully identified and, to a large extent, resolved discrepancies in data collected through various methods.
- Triangulation of data revealed insights into "clinical trial culture" and practices that can affect data accuracy.
- Collaboration between clinical trialists and qualitative social scientists, alongside preparatory studies, was crucial for the model's success.
Conclusions:
- Integrating qualitative social science with mixed methods and triangulation is feasible and effective in clinical trials.
- This approach can uncover and resolve inaccuracies in data concerning adherence and sensitive behaviors.
- The study highlights the impact of "trial culture" on data accuracy and suggests potential solutions.

