Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hearing aid benefit in everyday environments.

R M Cox1, G C Alexander

  • 1Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, Memphis State University, Tennessee.

Ear and Hearing
|April 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding Organisms Using Ecological Observatory Networks.

Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)·2023
Same author

Nanomatrix Coated Stent Enhances Endothelialization but Reduces Platelet, Smooth Muscle Cell, and Monocyte Adhesion under Physiologic Conditions.

ACS biomaterials science & engineering·2019
Same author

Multivariate genetic architecture of the Anolis dewlap reveals both shared and sex-specific features of a sexually dimorphic ornament.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2017
Same author

Intralocus sexual conflict, adaptive sex allocation, and the heritability of fitness.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2015
Same author

The uphill battle facing antiobesity drugs.

International journal of obesity (2005)·2014
Same author

An experimental test of the role of predators in the maintenance of a genetically based polymorphism.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2012
Same journal

Community-Informed Adaptation of a School-Based Hearing Health Intervention: Formative Evaluation for an Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Hearing Difficulty, Health Literacy, and Poorer Health Among Adults in the United States: 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Cultural Differences in Listening Environments Between Hispanic and White Non-Hispanic Cochlear Implant Users.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Detection of Inner Ear Malformations Based on Simple Anatomical Measurements: A Model Approach.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Avoiding Cisplatin-Related Hearing Loss, Including Implementing Sodium Thiosulfate as Otoprotectant Into Daily Pediatric Clinical Practice: Proceedings Based on Evidence and Expert Opinion From the Ototoxicity Taskforce of the SIOP Supportive Care Network.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Quantifying Miscommunications in Triadic Conversations: Effects of Hearing Impairment, Hearing Aids, and Background Noise.

Ear and hearing·2026
See all related articles

Hearing aid benefit varied significantly across different environments, with the living room offering the most benefit. Individual hearing aid fitting and subject-specific needs are crucial for optimizing hearing aid performance.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Speech and Hearing Sciences
  • Rehabilitation Engineering

Background:

  • Hearing aid benefit is crucial for improving speech intelligibility in hearing-impaired individuals.
  • Understanding how listening environments and hearing aid characteristics influence benefit is essential for effective fitting.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify hearing aid benefit in typical listening environments.
  • To investigate the impact of frequency response and visual cues on hearing aid benefit.
  • To explore individual variability in hearing aid benefit.

Main Methods:

  • Subjects with hearing impairments were fitted with three hearing aids with varying frequency response slopes.
  • Benefit was measured using the Connected Speech Test (CST) in living room, reverberant, and noisy environments.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The influence of visual cues and different frequency responses on benefit was analyzed.

    • Main Results:

    • Mean hearing aid benefit was highest in a living room (24%), significantly greater than in reverberant (7%) and noisy (-1%) settings.
    • Visual cues did not enhance hearing aid benefit across tested environments.
    • Individual benefit varied significantly, with 76% of subjects showing different benefit across hearing aid conditions.
    • Articulation indices did not predict within-subject benefit differences.

    Conclusions:

    • Hearing aid benefit is highly dependent on the listening environment, with favorable conditions yielding greater improvements.
    • Individual fitting and subject-specific factors play a significant role in determining hearing aid effectiveness.
    • Current prediction methods like articulation indices may not fully capture real-world benefit variations.