Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
Feedback control systems01:26

Feedback control systems

Feedback control systems are categorized in various ways based on their design, analysis, and signal types.
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Conversational Brain-Artificial Intelligence Interface.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2026
Same author

Neuro-cognitive multilevel causal modeling: A framework that bridges the explanatory gap between neuronal activity and cognition.

PLoS computational biology·2024
Same author

Benchmarking brain-computer interface algorithms: Riemannian approaches vs convolutional neural networks.

Journal of neural engineering·2024
Same author

Predicting motor behavior: an efficient EEG signal processing pipeline to detect brain states with potential therapeutic relevance for VR-based neurorehabilitation.

Virtual reality·2023
Same author

Workshops of the Eighth International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting: BCIs: The Next Frontier.

Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England)·2023
Same author

Are intrinsic neural timescales related to sensory processing? Evidence from abnormal behavioral states.

NeuroImage·2020
Same journal

Peripheral and central vestibular neuromodulation improve postural control in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomized, sham-controlled, multi-arm intervention study.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Ankle-foot orthosis mechanical testing: a scoping review.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Neuromechanical synergy patterns explain metabolic efficiency differences during the sit-to-walk transition.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

The classification of walking and phases of gait using EEG: a scoping review.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Biohybrid cochlear implants: neural interfaces, regenerative pathways, and translational benchmarks.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Transcutaneous spinal stimulation with upper extremity robotic training in chronic stroke and spinal cord injury: individual neurophysiological and clinical responses.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces
10:51

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces

Published on: March 10, 2011

Biased feedback in brain-computer interfaces.

Alvaro Barbero1, Moritz Grosse-Wentrup

  • 1Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Departamento de Ingeniería Informática) and Instituto de Ingeniería del Conocimiento, Francisco Tomás y Valiente 11, Madrid, Spain. alvaro.barbero@uam.es

Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation
|July 28, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Feedback design significantly impacts brain-computer interface (BCI) performance. Inaccurate feedback hinders skilled users but can benefit novices, suggesting personalized BCI feedback strategies are crucial for optimal learning.

More Related Videos

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces
10:51

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces

Published on: March 10, 2011

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Rehabilitation Engineering

Background:

  • Feedback is crucial for learning to operate brain-computer interfaces (BCIs).
  • Previous research has not established a significant link between feedback design and BCI performance.
  • Understanding how user beliefs about control influence BCI interaction is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of biased feedback on motor-imagery brain-computer interface (BCI) performance.
  • To determine if manipulating user perception of control impacts learning and performance.
  • To explore how individual skill levels moderate the effects of feedback design.

Main Methods:

  • Adaptation of a standard motor-imagery BCI paradigm.
  • Implementation of biased feedback to manipulate subjects' belief in their control level.
  • Assessment of BCI performance across different user skill levels.

Main Results:

  • Inaccurate feedback impedes the performance of subjects already proficient in operating BCIs.
  • Subjects performing at or near chance level may benefit from inaccurate feedback, potentially improving their performance.
  • Individual differences in skill level significantly influence the impact of feedback accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Optimal feedback design for BCIs should be individualized based on the user's current skill level.
  • Manipulating user belief about control can have differential effects on BCI performance.
  • Future BCI development should consider adaptive feedback mechanisms tailored to user proficiency.