Absorbable or non-absorbable sutures? A prospective, randomised evaluation of aesthetic outcomes in patients
R K Kundra1, S Newman, A Saithna
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B9 5SS, UK. rik.kundra@googlemail.com
Introduction:
We prospectively evaluated aesthetic outcomes in a group of randomised patients who underwent elective day-case hand and wrist surgery using either absorbable or non-absorbable sutures.
Patients And Methods:
A cohort of 100 adult patients were randomised using sealed envelopes to receive either absorbable or non-absorbable sutures for their wound closure. Clinical review was carried out at 6 weeks. A postal questionnaire was sent to all patients 3 months following surgery comprising a visual analogue scale (VAS) for wound satisfaction, a validated 6-point patient scar assessment tool and the shortened version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH).
Results:
From the postal questionnaire, 70 responses were received. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of VAS, patient scar assessment tool and quick DASH.
Conclusions:
For elective day-case hand and wrist surgery, either suture material can be used confidently with respect to overall aesthetic appearance in such patients.