Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training
Published on: July 27, 2022
Weight estimation in paediatrics: a comparison of the APLS formula and the formula 'Weight=3(age)+7'
Mark D Luscombe1, Ben D Owens, Derek Burke
1Anaesthetic Department, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, Doncaster, UK. mark.luscombe@dbh.nhs.uk
Insights
The formula Weight=2(age+4) significantly underestimates pediatric weight, potentially leading to under-resuscitation. A new formula, Weight=3(age)+7, offers a more accurate estimation for children aged 1-13 years.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric emergency medicine
- Clinical pharmacology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Accurate weight estimation is critical for pediatric resuscitation.
- Current weight estimation formulas may not reflect contemporary pediatric anthropometrics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of the current pediatric weight estimation formula: Weight(kg)=2(age+4).
- To assess a newly derived formula: Weight(kg)=3(age)+7.
- To compare the validity of both formulas in a pediatric emergency department population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 93,827 children aged 1-16 years.
- Data collected from pediatric attendances at a major UK emergency department (ED).
- Comparison of actual weights against estimated weights using both formulas.
Main Results:
- The formula Weight=2(age+4) underestimated weights by a mean of 33.4%.
- The formula Weight=3(age)+7 underestimated weights by a mean of 6.9%.
- The formula Weight=3(age)+7 was applicable from 1 to 13 years.
Conclusions:
- The current weight estimation formula leads to significant underestimation, risking under-resuscitation.
- The formula Weight=3(age)+7 provides a safer and more accurate weight estimate for children aged 1 year to puberty.
- Improved weight estimation is crucial for safe and effective pediatric emergency care.
Objectives:
To gather data on the ages and weights of children aged between 1 and 16 years in order to assess the validity of the current weight estimation formula 'Weight(kg)=2(age+4)' and the newly derived formula 'Weight=3(age)+7'.
Design:
Retrospective study using data collected from paediatric attendances at an emergency department (ED).
Setting:
A large paediatric ED in a major UK city.
Patients:
93,827 children aged 1-16 years attending the ED between June 2003 and September 2008.
Main Outcome Measures:
Percentage weight difference between the child's actual weight and the expected weight, the latter determined by 'Weight(kg)=2(age+4)' and by 'Weight(kg)=3(age)+7', in order to compare these two formulae.
Results:
The weights of seriously ill children were recorded in only 20.5% of cases, necessitating a weight estimate in the remainder. The formula 'Weight=2(age+4)' underestimated children's weights by a mean of 33.4% (95% CI 33.2% to 33.6%) over the age range 1-16 years whereas the formula 'Weight=3(age)+7' provided a mean underestimate of 6.9% (95% CI 6.8% to 7.1%). The formula 'Weight=3(age)+7' remains applicable from 1 to 13 years inclusive.
Conclusions:
Weight estimation is of paramount importance in paediatric resuscitation. This study shows that the current estimation formula provides a significant underestimate of children's weights. When used to calculate drug and fluid dosages, this may lead to the under-resuscitation of a critically ill child. The formula 'Weight=3(age)+7' can be used over a larger age range (from 1 year to puberty) and allows a safe and more accurate estimate of the weight of children today.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
Experimental Determination of Chemical Formula

