Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Case-control studies of screening.

S M Moss1

  • 1Department of Health Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, U.K.

International Journal of Epidemiology
|March 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The impact of mammography screening programmes on incidence of advanced breast cancer in Europe: a literature review.

BMC cancer·2018
Same author

FIT for the future: a case for risk-based colorectal cancer screening using the faecal immunochemical test.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2016
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening: a simulation study based on ERSPC data.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2014
Same author

Comparison of the performance of HPV tests in women with abnormal cytology: results of a study within the NHS cervical screening programme.

Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology·2014
Same author

Estimating breast cancer mortality reduction and overdiagnosis due to screening for different strategies in the United Kingdom.

British journal of cancer·2014
Same author

Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: evidence from the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England.

Endoscopy·2012
Same journal

Age at menarche and adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: triangulating evidence from multivariable and Mendelian randomization analyses.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Life-course trajectories of cardiovascular disease risk factors in rural India: Andhra Pradesh Children and Parents Study (APCAPS) 2003-2023.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Cohort Profile Update: The Young Lives study.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

From the departing Editors in Chief.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Data Resource Profile: Cheeloo Lifespan Electronic-health reseArch Data-library (Cheeloo LEAD).

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Cohort Profile Update: The Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Cohort.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Case-control studies evaluating screening data, particularly for breast and cervical cancer, are prone to selection bias. Researchers should interpret these findings cautiously, especially when controlled trial data is unavailable.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health
  • Medical Screening

Background:

  • Case-control studies are frequently used to evaluate the effectiveness of medical screening programs.
  • However, applying this methodology to screening data introduces potential biases, notably selection bias.
  • Previous studies on breast and cervical cancer screening using case-control designs have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the application of case-control studies in analyzing screening data.
  • To review published case-control studies on breast and cervical cancer screening.
  • To assess the impact of selection bias and other methodological challenges in screening evaluations.

Main Methods:

  • Review of published case-control studies on breast cancer screening.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of a UK study designed to estimate selection bias in screening.
  • Discussion of challenges specific to cervical screening case-control studies, including handling screen-detected invasive cases and differentiating smear types.

    • Main Results:

    • Case-control study results are susceptible to selection bias, potentially distorting findings.
    • A UK study highlighted the significant effect of selection bias in breast cancer screening evaluations.
    • Cervical screening case-control studies face additional complexities in case definition and data interpretation.

    Conclusions:

    • Case-control studies evaluating screening interventions require cautious interpretation.
    • The presence of selection bias can significantly impact the perceived effectiveness of screening programs.
    • Findings from case-control studies on screening should be viewed with skepticism, especially in the absence of robust controlled trial data.