Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Correlation of Experimental Data01:23

Correlation of Experimental Data

Dimensional analysis simplifies complex physical problems and guides experimental investigations, but it does not provide complete solutions. It identifies the dimensionless groups that influence a phenomenon, but experimental data is needed to establish the specific relationships and validate theoretical predictions.
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity, and...
Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the strength of the linear...
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the other increases, and...
2D NMR: Heteronuclear Single-Quantum Correlation Spectroscopy (HSQC)01:19

2D NMR: Heteronuclear Single-Quantum Correlation Spectroscopy (HSQC)

Heteronuclear single-quantum correlation spectroscopy (HSQC) is a 2D NMR technique that reveals one-bond correlations between hydrogen and a heteronucleus. The HSQC experiment is similar to the heteronuclear correlation experiment (HETCOR) but is more sensitive. In the HSQC spectrum, the proton chemical shift is plotted on the horizontal F2 axis, while the 13C chemical shift is plotted on the vertical F1 axis. The corresponding proton and 13C spectra are also shown. The HSQC contour plot does...
2D NMR: Overview of Heteronuclear Correlation Techniques01:18

2D NMR: Overview of Heteronuclear Correlation Techniques

Heteronuclear correlation spectroscopy is an analytical technique that investigates the coupling between different types of nuclei, often a proton and an X-nucleus, such as carbon-13 or nitrogen-15. This method is commonly used in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to gain insights into complex chemical compounds' structural and compositional aspects. A typical heteronuclear correlation spectrum displays X-nucleus chemical shifts on one axis and a proton spectrum on the other axis.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Recurrent patterns of TOP1-mediated neuronal genomic damage shared by major neurodegenerative disorders.

Cell·2026
Same author

Reply: Genetically proxied GLP1R expression does not predict exenatide response in the Exenatide-PD3 trial.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Topographical archetypes of somatic mutagenesis in cancer.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

The Common Fund Data Ecosystem (CFDE).

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A recurrent sequencing artifact on Illumina sequencers with two-color fluorescent dye chemistry and its impact on somatic variant detection.

Genome biology·2026
Same author

GLP1R expression and parkinson's disease and related disorders in GLP-1RA-treated type 2 diabetes.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2026
Same journal

Covariance decomposition for distance based species tree estimation.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SNPio: a Python interface for population genomic data processing.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SpaHNR: a spatial domain identification method via sparse attention-based hierarchical node representation and multi-view contrastive learning.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

OpenIMC: an open-source platform for analyzing single-cell and spatial proteomics by imaging mass cytometry.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

NAP: an open source pipeline for cross-domain microbiome profiling using Nanopore sequencing-derived amplicon data.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SurvGME: an R package for survival analysis with graphical and measurement error models.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

A Semiautomated ChIP-Seq Procedure for Large-scale Epigenetic Studies
08:04

A Semiautomated ChIP-Seq Procedure for Large-scale Epigenetic Studies

Published on: August 13, 2020

Quantized correlation coefficient for measuring reproducibility of ChIP-chip data.

Shouyong Peng1, Mitzi I Kuroda, Peter J Park

  • 1Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

BMC Bioinformatics
|July 29, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new Quantized Correlation Coefficient (QCC) accurately measures reproducibility in ChIP-chip data. This method is robust to signal levels, unlike standard coefficients, improving data quality assessment.

More Related Videos

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes
05:07

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes

Published on: November 7, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

A Semiautomated ChIP-Seq Procedure for Large-scale Epigenetic Studies
08:04

A Semiautomated ChIP-Seq Procedure for Large-scale Epigenetic Studies

Published on: August 13, 2020

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes
05:07

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes

Published on: November 7, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by microarray hybridization (ChIP-chip) is crucial for studying genome-wide protein-DNA interactions and histone modifications.
  • Replicate experiments in ChIP-chip are essential for data quality assessment, typically using correlation coefficients to measure reproducibility.
  • Standard correlation coefficients can be misleading as they are influenced by both signal reproducibility and the amount of binding signal present.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel statistical measure for assessing ChIP-chip data reproducibility.
  • To create a correlation coefficient that is less dependent on the magnitude of the binding signal.
  • To improve the accuracy and robustness of reproducibility assessment in genomic experiments.

Main Methods:

  • Developed the Quantized Correlation Coefficient (QCC) by discretizing data into quantiles.
  • Implemented a merging procedure to group background probes and reduce noise influence.
  • Recalculated the Pearson correlation coefficient on the processed data.

Main Results:

  • QCC demonstrates significantly less dependence on signal amount compared to standard correlation coefficients.
  • QCC accurately reflects reproducibility across ChIP-chip replicates with varying signal enrichment and coverage.
  • The developed method is more robust than Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients for ChIP-chip data analysis.

Conclusions:

  • QCC provides a more reliable measure of ChIP-chip data reproducibility, especially when signal levels vary.
  • The quantization and merging procedures in QCC can aid in distinguishing signal from background noise.
  • QCC is applicable beyond ChIP-chip, offering a robust method for assessing reproducibility in array CGH and gene expression data.