Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
Published on: August 19, 2025
Clinical implications of the BARI 2D and COURAGE trials: overview
Maria Mori Brooks1, William E Boden, Robert L Frye
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. mbrooks@pitt.edu
Insights
For stable coronary artery disease (CAD), the COURAGE trial found percutaneous coronary intervention plus optimal medical therapy did not improve outcomes versus optimal medical therapy alone. The BARI 2D trial showed revascularization did not reduce mortality but CABG lowered major events in select patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- The Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) and Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trials are pivotal studies in stable coronary artery disease (CAD).
- These trials investigated the efficacy of revascularization strategies combined with optimal medical therapy in patients with stable CAD, including those with type 2 diabetes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the impact of the COURAGE and BARI 2D trial results on current clinical practice for managing stable coronary artery disease (CAD).
- To re-evaluate treatment approaches for patients experiencing stable ischemic symptoms, considering the findings from these large-scale clinical trials.
- To identify and discuss key unanswered questions in the management of CAD following the COURAGE and BARI 2D trials.
Main Methods:
- The COURAGE trial compared percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) against OMT alone in stable CAD patients.
- The BARI 2D trial compared prompt revascularization (PCI or CABG) plus intensive medical therapy against intensive medical therapy alone in patients with type 2 diabetes and stable CAD.
- This special issue synthesizes expert opinions on the clinical implications and remaining questions from these trials.
Main Results:
- The COURAGE trial demonstrated no significant difference in long-term rates of death, myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular events between PCI+OMT and OMT alone.
- The BARI 2D trial found no reduction in all-cause mortality or the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke with prompt revascularization compared to intensive medical therapy alone.
- However, in the BARI 2D trial, coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) significantly reduced major cardiovascular events, specifically myocardial infarction, compared to intensive medical therapy alone in appropriate patients.
Conclusions:
- The COURAGE and BARI 2D trial results necessitate a re-evaluation of initial revascularization strategies for stable CAD.
- While PCI may not offer additional benefits over OMT alone for stable CAD, CABG may be beneficial for select patient groups.
- Further research is needed to address the remaining questions regarding the optimal management of stable CAD and ischemic symptoms.
Abstract:
The Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial established that, for patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), an initial management strategy of percutaneous coronary intervention plus optimal medical therapy did not reduce the long-term rates of death, myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular events as compared with optimal medical therapy alone. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) Trial reported that for patients with type 2 diabetes and stable CAD, a strategy of prompt coronary revascularization and intensive medical therapy did not reduce all-cause mortality or the composite of death, myocardial infarction or stroke compared with intensive medical therapy alone; however, in the group of patients appropriate for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), prompt revascularization with CABG resulted in significantly lower rates of major cardiovascular events, specifically myocardial infarction, than intensive medical therapy alone. The results from these two large multicenter clinical trials have led the medical community to re-evaluate how one should approach and treat patients with CAD and stable ischemic symptoms. In this special issue, experts from several disciplines discuss how the COURAGE and BARI 2D results have affected clinical practice and highlight the key questions that remain unanswered.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Standards of Care II
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation