Transmucosal healing around peri-implant defects: crestal and subcrestal implant placement in dogs

This study was designed to evaluate the transmucosal healing response of implants placed with the junction of the smooth surfaces, either crestal or subcrestal, into simulated extraction defects after healing periods of 1 and 3 months.

A total of 23 Straumann SP v3.3 mm NN, SLA 10 mm implants were placed in the mandibular premolar regions of three greyhound dogs 3 months after the teeth were removed. Five control implants were placed at the crestal bone level, and test implants with surgically created peri-implant defects of 1.25 mm wide x 5 mm depth were placed either at the crestal (nine implants) or at the 2 mm subcrestal (nine implants) bone level. Implants on the right side were placed 1 month before the dogs were sacrificed, and implants on the left side were placed 3 months before sacrifice. All dogs had daily plaque control following surgery and were sacrificed 3 months after implant placement for histological and histometric analyses.

Mesial-distal ground sections of the control and test implant specimens showed a greater %BIC in the coronal defect region after 3 months of healing. This healing response was incomplete for the test implants compared with the control implants after a 1-month healing period. The histometric measurements for test implants placed at the crestal bone level or 2 mm subcrestal with surgically created peri-implant defects were more coronal or closer to the implant margin compared with the control implants. Additionally, the degree of osseointegration between the newly formed bone and the implant surface was similar between the test implants.

Peri-implant defects of 1.25 mm width healed with spontaneous bone regeneration around implants placed transmucosally at crestal or 2 mm subcrestal with a high degree of osseointegration after a 3-month healing period.