Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Allele Traits01:49

Multiple Allele Traits

The Concept of Multiple Allelism
Multiple Allele Traits01:49

Multiple Allele Traits

The Concept of Multiple Allelism
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.Positive Frequency-Dependent SelectionIn positive...
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS01:11

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS

Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Implementation of a medical genomics program for rare diseases in Uruguay.

Orphanet journal of rare diseases·2026
Same author

Individual identification of dairy cows with occluded camera views using open-set contrastive learning model.

Journal of dairy science·2026
Same author

Real-time milk traits and wearable sensor-derived rumination and feeding behaviors for assessing heat stress effects in dairy cattle.

Journal of dairy science·2026
Same author

Timing of pregnancy losses in grazing lactating dairy cows based on cervical interferon-stimulated gene-15 mRNA, pregnancy-associated glycoproteins, and progesterone dynamics: an exploratory study.

Journal of dairy science·2026
Same author

The shared genomic history of Middle- to Late-Holocene populations from the Southern Cone of South America.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same author

Reliable enteric methane prediction from the cattle (Bos taurus) rumen microbiome.

Communications biology·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive Analysis of Macrophage Dynamics, CCBE1, and Their Implications in Colorectal Cancer Microenvironment: Insights Into Tumor Progression and Therapeutic Opportunities.

Genetics research·2026
Same journal

Compound Heterozygous ATM Variants Cause Adolescent-Onset Cerebellar and Extrapyramidal Disease Without Telangiectasia in a Consanguineous Pakistani Family.

Genetics research·2026
Same journal

Biological Context-Informed and Population-Stratified Strategies Improve Genetic Diagnosis of CCDC22-Related Disorder.

Genetics research·2026
Same journal

Predicting the Impact of Deleterious Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the p47ING1a Isoform of Human ING1 Gene.

Genetics research·2026
Same journal

Two Novel FBN2 Variants Causing Congenital Contractural Arachnodactyly.

Genetics research·2026
Same journal

Identification of Genetic Diagnostic Markers for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Genetics research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

L2-Boosting algorithm applied to high-dimensional problems in genomic selection.

Oscar González-Recio1, Kent A Weigel, Daniel Gianola

  • 1Departamento de Mejora Genética Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias, Madrid 28040, Spain. gonzalez.oscar@inia.es

Genetics Research
|July 30, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The L2-Boosting algorithm, using ordinary least squares (OLS), offers a competitive and accurate method for genomic selection in livestock. It provides high predictive accuracy and low bias in genomic-assisted evaluations with efficient computation.

More Related Videos

Generating the Transcriptional Regulation View of Transcriptomic Features for Prediction Task and Dark Biomarker Detection on Small Datasets
03:37

Generating the Transcriptional Regulation View of Transcriptomic Features for Prediction Task and Dark Biomarker Detection on Small Datasets

Published on: March 1, 2024

Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) in Microbiome Data
04:57

Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) in Microbiome Data

Published on: May 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Generating the Transcriptional Regulation View of Transcriptomic Features for Prediction Task and Dark Biomarker Detection on Small Datasets
03:37

Generating the Transcriptional Regulation View of Transcriptomic Features for Prediction Task and Dark Biomarker Detection on Small Datasets

Published on: March 1, 2024

Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) in Microbiome Data
04:57

Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) in Microbiome Data

Published on: May 16, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Machine Learning
  • Animal Breeding

Background:

  • Genomic selection is crucial for predicting animal performance.
  • High-dimensional genomic data presents computational challenges.
  • Machine learning algorithms offer potential for improved genomic prediction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the L2-Boosting algorithm for genomic selection.
  • To compare L2-Boosting with existing methods like Bayesian LASSO (BL) and BayesA.
  • To assess the performance of OLS-Boosting and NP-Boosting learners.

Main Methods:

  • Applied L2-Boosting with OLS and NP learners to two datasets: Holstein sires (lifetime production) and broilers (food conversion).
  • Split data into training and testing sets for model validation.
  • Compared L2-Boosting results with BL and BayesA regression models.

Main Results:

  • OLS-Boosting achieved the highest Pearson correlations (0.65 for dairy, 0.33 for broilers) and lowest bias and MSE in both datasets.
  • BL showed better accuracy than BayesA in dairy cattle but not in broilers.
  • L2-Boosting demonstrated competitive accuracy and low bias.

Conclusions:

  • L2-Boosting, particularly with OLS, is a viable and efficient alternative for genomic selection.
  • The algorithm provides accurate predictions and reduces bias in genomic-assisted evaluations.
  • This method offers a computationally efficient approach for large-scale genomic studies.