Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing Color Inconstancy of CAD/CAM Materials: Influence of CIE White LED Illuminants and Substrate Shade.

Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]·2026
Same author

Effect of Successive Bleaching Treatments Followed by Staining on Color, Whiteness, and Translucency of Polymer-Based CAD-CAM Materials.

Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]·2026
Same author

Interrelational Proteomic Sequence Features Enhance Predictive Modeling: Application to COVID-19 Severity.

Biomedicines·2026
Same author

Integrated Transcriptomic and Histological Analysis of TP53/CTNNB1 Mutations and Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Genes·2026
Same author

Effect of aging on color and whiteness of single shade and group shade resin composites in restorations with different cavity configurations.

Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials·2025
Same author

Large-scale randomized double-blind field clinical trial for safety and efficacy assessment of the DNA vaccine Neoleish against canine leishmaniasis.

PLoS neglected tropical diseases·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Evaluating the Effects of Different Polishing Methods on Color Stability of Dental Restorations in Pediatric Dentistry
03:37

Evaluating the Effects of Different Polishing Methods on Color Stability of Dental Restorations in Pediatric Dentistry

Published on: June 6, 2025

Color difference thresholds in dental ceramics.

Razvan Ghinea1, María M Pérez, Luis J Herrera

  • 1Department of Optics, Faculty of Science, University of Granada, Campus Fuentenueva, Granada, Spain.

Journal of Dentistry
|July 31, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The CIEDE2000 formula better evaluates dental ceramic color differences than CIELAB. A novel TSK Fuzzy Approximation method reliably calculates these color thresholds, differentiating perceptibility and acceptability.

More Related Videos

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
07:42

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material

Published on: December 20, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Evaluating the Effects of Different Polishing Methods on Color Stability of Dental Restorations in Pediatric Dentistry
03:37

Evaluating the Effects of Different Polishing Methods on Color Stability of Dental Restorations in Pediatric Dentistry

Published on: June 6, 2025

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
07:42

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material

Published on: December 20, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Dental Materials Science
  • Color Science
  • Metrology

Background:

  • Accurate color difference evaluation is crucial for dental ceramics to ensure aesthetic outcomes.
  • Existing color difference formulas like CIELAB (ΔE(ab)(*)) have limitations in precisely assessing dental ceramic shades.
  • Novel methods are needed to refine the calculation of perceptibility and acceptability thresholds for dental ceramics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine perceptibility and acceptability thresholds for dental ceramics.
  • To compare the efficacy of CIEDE2000 (ΔE(00)) and CIELAB (ΔE(ab)(*)) color difference formulas.
  • To evaluate a TSK Fuzzy Approximation as a novel method for threshold calculation.

Main Methods:

  • A 13-observer panel assessed 105 pairs of ceramic discs for color difference judgments.
  • Color differences were calculated using CIEDE2000 and CIELAB formulas.
  • S-shaped curve fitting and TSK Fuzzy Approximation were employed to determine 50:50% perceptibility and acceptability thresholds.

Main Results:

  • The CIEDE2000 formula showed a better fit for evaluating color difference thresholds compared to CIELAB.
  • Acceptability thresholds were ΔE(00)=2.25 and ΔE(ab)(*)=3.46 (S-shaped), and ΔE(00)=2.23 and ΔE(ab)(*)=3.48 (TSK Fuzzy).
  • Perceptibility thresholds were ΔE(00)=1.30 and ΔE(ab)(*)=1.80 (S-shaped), and ΔE(00)=1.25 and ΔE(ab)(*)=1.74 (TSK Fuzzy).

Conclusions:

  • CIEDE2000 is superior to CIELAB for assessing dental ceramic color differences.
  • A statistically significant difference exists between perceptibility and acceptability thresholds.
  • TSK Fuzzy Approximation is a reliable alternative for calculating color thresholds in dental ceramics.