Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Errors in Taping01:18

Errors in Taping

Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying01:19

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of attention,...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The hope and the hype of artificial intelligence for syncope management.

European heart journal. Digital health·2025
Same author

Will Artificial Intelligence Be "Better" Than Humans in the Management of Syncope?

JACC. Advances·2024
Same author

Autonomic modulation: Getting it "just right".

Heart rhythm O2·2023
Same author

COVID-19 and postural tachycardia syndrome: a case series.

European heart journal. Case reports·2022
Same author

Massive cotyledenoid leiomyoma treated with uterine-conserving surgery.

F&S reports·2021
Same author

Vaginal Hysterectomy: Historical Footnote or Viable Route?

Obstetrics and gynecology·2020
Same journal

Bridging Science and Practice in Gender-Affirming Care: A Compendium for Gynecologists.

Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Evidence, Clinical Expertise, and Research Gaps in Gender-Affirming Care.

Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Evaluation and Management of the Pediatric Gender-Diverse Patient.

Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Expanding Access to Cervical Cancer Screening for Transgender and Nonbinary Individuals.

Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Updates on Breast Cancer Screening and Special Considerations for Transgender Men and Women.

Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Contraceptive Needs of the Transmasculine Patient.

Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Application of Laparoscopic Ultrasonography in Primary Choledochal Suture during Combined Two-lens Surgery
04:03

Application of Laparoscopic Ultrasonography in Primary Choledochal Suture during Combined Two-lens Surgery

Published on: March 28, 2025

Understanding errors during laparoscopic surgery.

William H Parker1

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saint John's Health Center, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, 1450 Tenth Street, Santa Monica, Los Angeles, CA 90401, USA. wparker@ucla.edu

Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America
|August 3, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Human error is unavoidable in laparoscopic surgery. Analyzing malpractice cases reveals cognitive, system, and training factors that can be improved using aviation safety principles to enhance surgical outcomes.

More Related Videos

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Application of Laparoscopic Ultrasonography in Primary Choledochal Suture during Combined Two-lens Surgery
04:03

Application of Laparoscopic Ultrasonography in Primary Choledochal Suture during Combined Two-lens Surgery

Published on: March 28, 2025

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Safety
  • Medical Error Analysis
  • Human Factors in Medicine

Background:

  • Laparoscopic surgery, despite advancements, faces inherent risks of complications.
  • Human error is a recognized factor in surgical adverse events, even with skilled practitioners.
  • Analysis of malpractice cases provides insights into surgical complications.

Observation:

  • Videotaped laparoscopic procedures from malpractice cases were reviewed.
  • Evaluations focused on identifying cognitive factors, systems errors, equipment malfunctions, and surgeon training deficiencies.
  • The study examined the root causes of complications during minimally invasive surgery.

Findings:

  • Cognitive factors, systemic issues, and training gaps contribute to surgical errors.
  • Principles from aviation crew resource management, such as situation awareness, are relevant to surgical safety.
  • Current surgical training paradigms may not adequately address all potential error sources.

Implications:

  • Adapting aviation safety principles can mitigate systems errors in surgery.
  • Revising surgical training is crucial for improving patient safety and reducing complications.
  • Enhanced focus on human factors and system design can lead to safer laparoscopic procedures.