Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas I01:17

Ethical Dilemmas I

Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Kubler Ross's Stages of Dying01:21

Kubler Ross's Stages of Dying

Elisabeth Kübler-Ross significantly advanced psychology's understanding of the process of dying with her influential book, On Death and Dying (1969). She focused on studying terminally ill individuals and outlined five stages commonly experienced when coping with death: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance.
In denial, individuals reject the reality of their condition, often thinking, "This isn't true; I feel fine," as a way to protect themselves from emotional distress. Anger...
Nursing Ethical Principles II01:27

Nursing Ethical Principles II

Ethical principles are essential in guiding nurses to fulfill their responsibilities, focusing on the quality of nursing care and decision-making. These principles, including autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity, shape the ethical framework within healthcare settings.
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...
Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Would a single centralized ethical review in Europe be feasible for multinational trials in public health emergencies?

European journal of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Neural Organoids: How Should We Handle the Possibility of Sentience?

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same author

Equity and representativeness in pragmatic drug trials: methodological and ethical considerations.

BMJ evidence-based medicine·2026
Same author

A Review of Medical Data Sharing Initiatives With a Focus on the Use of Blockchain Technologies: Qualitative Comparative Analysis.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Attitudes Towards the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Conjoint Analysis Survey in Singapore.

Asian bioethics review·2026
Same author

Looking Under the Lamppost - Organoid Intelligence and the Ethics of Neural Organoids.

AJOB neuroscience·2026
Same journal

The moral significance of moral distress.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2026
Same journal

A defense of empathy: Edith Stein, nursing, and prisoner/patients.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Should we be testing pregnant patients' urine for drugs? An applied ethics approach.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Taking the Right to Die Seriously.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Improving bioethics by clarifying and elaborating its methodology: a response to Gomez-Virseda and colleagues.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Bioethics as bios ethikos.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

A Standardized Pig to Macaque Heterotopic Heart Xenotransplantation Model
06:52

A Standardized Pig to Macaque Heterotopic Heart Xenotransplantation Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

Euthanasia: agreeing to disagree?

Søren Holm1

  • 1Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, School of Law, Williamson Building, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. Soren.holm@manchester.ac.uk

Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy
|August 3, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

In liberal societies, "agreeing to disagree" on active, voluntary euthanasia is complex. This approach is philosophically problematic and often results in unstable compromises, challenging its practical application in policy debates.

More Related Videos

Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
10:34

Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Published on: August 30, 2020

A Pacing-Controlled Procedure for the Assessment of Heart Rate-Dependent Diastolic Functions in Murine Heart Failure Models
07:49

A Pacing-Controlled Procedure for the Assessment of Heart Rate-Dependent Diastolic Functions in Murine Heart Failure Models

Published on: July 21, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

A Standardized Pig to Macaque Heterotopic Heart Xenotransplantation Model
06:52

A Standardized Pig to Macaque Heterotopic Heart Xenotransplantation Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
10:34

Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Published on: August 30, 2020

A Pacing-Controlled Procedure for the Assessment of Heart Rate-Dependent Diastolic Functions in Murine Heart Failure Models
07:49

A Pacing-Controlled Procedure for the Assessment of Heart Rate-Dependent Diastolic Functions in Murine Heart Failure Models

Published on: July 21, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Legal Philosophy
  • Political Theory

Background:

  • Discussions on legalizing active, voluntary euthanasia often propose 'agreeing to disagree' as a societal approach.
  • This proposed resolution is frequently presented as a straightforward method for managing intractable ethical debates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the philosophical underpinnings and practical implications of 'agreeing to disagree' in the context of euthanasia legalization.
  • To analyze whether this approach offers a stable and philosophically sound resolution to the debate.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical analysis of the concept of 'agreeing to disagree'.
  • Examination of the logical consistency and ethical implications of applying this concept to contentious issues like euthanasia.
  • Exploration of potential outcomes and stability of compromises reached through this method.

Main Results:

  • 'Agreeing to disagree' is philosophically more complex than commonly assumed.
  • The act of agreeing to disagree in the euthanasia debate can lead to significant philosophical challenges.
  • This approach frequently results in compromises that lack long-term stability.

Conclusions:

  • The principle of 'agreeing to disagree' is not a simple or stable solution for the active, voluntary euthanasia debate.
  • Societies should approach such complex ethical issues with more robust philosophical and practical considerations than mere agreement to disagree.