Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Double Resonance Techniques: Overview01:12

Double Resonance Techniques: Overview

Double resonance techniques in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy involve the simultaneous application of two different frequencies or radiofrequency pulses to manipulate and observe two distinct nuclear spins. One important application of double resonance is spin decoupling, which selectively suppresses coupling with one type of nucleus while observing the NMR signal from another nucleus, simplifying the spectrum and enhancing resolution.
Spin decoupling is usually achieved by...
¹³C NMR: Distortionless Enhancement by Polarization Transfer (DEPT)01:20

¹³C NMR: Distortionless Enhancement by Polarization Transfer (DEPT)

When proton-coupled carbon-13 spectra are simplified by a broadband proton decoupling technique, structural information about the coupled protons is lost. Distortionless enhancement by polarization transfer (DEPT) is a technique that provides information on the number of hydrogens attached to each carbon in a molecule. While the DEPT experiment utilizes complex pulse sequences, the pulse delay and flip angle are specifically manipulated. The resulting signals have different phases depending on...
Long-patch Base Excision Repair01:02

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
¹³C NMR: ¹H–¹³C Decoupling01:04

¹³C NMR: ¹H–¹³C Decoupling

The probability of having two carbon-13 atoms next to each other is negligible because of the low natural abundance of carbon-13. Consequently, peak splitting due to carbon-carbon spin-spin coupling is not observed in spectra. However, protons up to three sigma bonds away split the carbon signal according to the n+1 rule, resulting in complicated spectra.
A broadband decoupling technique is used to simplify these complex, sometimes overlapping, signals. Broadband decoupling relies on a...
Impact01:30

Impact

Impact occurs when two bodies collide, leading to the application of impulsive forces between them. Analyzing impact mechanics involves considering two colliding particles moving along a line known as the line of impact, which passes through their centers and is perpendicular to the contact plane.
When particles with different initial velocities collide, they induce deformation by applying equal and opposite impulses. At the point of maximum deformation, the particles move together with...
Voltammetry: Stripping Methods01:13

Voltammetry: Stripping Methods

Anodic Stripping Voltammetry (ASV), Cathodic Stripping Voltammetry (CSV), and Adsorptive Stripping Voltammetry (AdSV) are electrochemical techniques used to determine trace amounts of analytes in solution. These methods involve applying a potential to an electrode and measuring the resulting current.
Anodic Stripping Voltammetry (ASV)
ASV is used to determine metals and metalloids at trace levels. It involves two steps: deposition and stripping. First, a negative potential is applied to the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Raising medical students' awareness for the interdependence between oral health and systemic diseases - evaluation of a problem-based learning intervention: an exploratory pilot study.

BMC primary care·2026
Same author

Oral Health Status as a Mediating Effect Between Psychosocial Factors and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life.

International dental journal·2026
Same author

Gap Formation at Luting Interfaces of CAD/CAM Ceramic and Composite Partial Crowns Assessed by OCT.

Dentistry journal·2026
Same author

Dental Trauma Prevention and Injury Measures Among Supervisors of German Elite Handball Teams: A Questionnaire-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Clinical and experimental dental research·2025
Same author

A New Approach to Measuring Student-Teacher Relationship in Dental Education: Validation of the Working Alliance Inventory for Education (WAI-EDU).

Medical science educator·2025
Same author

Temporomandibular disorders and the use of oral splints among elite sport athletes: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study in Germany.

Clinical oral investigations·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Simultaneous Multi-surface Anodizations and Stair-like Reverse Biases Detachment of Anodic Aluminum Oxides in Sulfuric and Oxalic Acid Electrolyte
10:27

Simultaneous Multi-surface Anodizations and Stair-like Reverse Biases Detachment of Anodic Aluminum Oxides in Sulfuric and Oxalic Acid Electrolyte

Published on: October 5, 2017

Impulse debracketing compared to conventional debonding.

Michael Knösel1, Simone Mattysek, Klaus Jung

  • 1Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany. r.veberiene@gmail.com

The Angle Orthodontist
|August 4, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Impulse debonding effectively removes orthodontic brackets with minimal enamel damage, offering a safe alternative to traditional methods. This technique typically separates at the bracket-adhesive interface, preserving tooth structure regardless of adhesive type.

More Related Videos

Spatial Separation of Molecular Conformers and Clusters
10:37

Spatial Separation of Molecular Conformers and Clusters

Published on: January 9, 2014

Separating Beads and Cells in Multi-channel Microfluidic Devices Using Dielectrophoresis and Laminar Flow
09:45

Separating Beads and Cells in Multi-channel Microfluidic Devices Using Dielectrophoresis and Laminar Flow

Published on: February 4, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Simultaneous Multi-surface Anodizations and Stair-like Reverse Biases Detachment of Anodic Aluminum Oxides in Sulfuric and Oxalic Acid Electrolyte
10:27

Simultaneous Multi-surface Anodizations and Stair-like Reverse Biases Detachment of Anodic Aluminum Oxides in Sulfuric and Oxalic Acid Electrolyte

Published on: October 5, 2017

Spatial Separation of Molecular Conformers and Clusters
10:37

Spatial Separation of Molecular Conformers and Clusters

Published on: January 9, 2014

Separating Beads and Cells in Multi-channel Microfluidic Devices Using Dielectrophoresis and Laminar Flow
09:45

Separating Beads and Cells in Multi-channel Microfluidic Devices Using Dielectrophoresis and Laminar Flow

Published on: February 4, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontic materials science
  • Dental biomaterials
  • Enamel surface integrity

Background:

  • Conventional orthodontic bracket removal methods can cause significant enamel damage.
  • Evaluating novel debonding techniques is crucial for minimizing iatrogenic effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare impulse debonding with three conventional methods for orthodontic bracket removal.
  • To assess the degree of enamel surface damage associated with each debonding technique.

Main Methods:

  • Ninety-six extracted third molars were bonded with composite adhesive system (CAS) or glass-ionomeric cement (GIC).
  • Brackets were debonded using pliers, side-cutter, lift-off instrument, or impulse debonding.
  • Enamel surfaces were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy and the Adhesive Remnant Index.

Main Results:

  • Impulse debonding resulted in 0% enamel damage, compared to 4-21% for conventional methods.
  • Highest Adhesive Remnant Index grades were observed with impulse debonding.
  • No significant difference in enamel damage was found between CAS and GIC adhesives.

Conclusions:

  • Impulse debonding is a viable alternative for orthodontic bracket removal.
  • This method minimizes enamel damage by separating at the bracket-adhesive interface.
  • Enamel preservation is achieved irrespective of the adhesive system used.