Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...
Toxicity Testing in Animals01:23

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Chemical Smiler: CHEMICal Abstraction Leading to SMILEs of Reference.

Journal of computational chemistryĀ·2026
Same author

Scientific Opinion on Benzophenone - 4 (CAS No. 4065-45-6, EC No. 223-772-2) used in cosmetics products - SCCS/1660/23.

NAM journalĀ·2026
Same author

SCCS opinion on biphenyl-2-ol and sodium 2-biphenylolate used in cosmetic products (CAS/EC No. 90-43-7/201-993-5 and 132-27-4/205-055-6)- SCCS/1669/24.

NAM journalĀ·2026
Same author

In silico prediction of Ames mutagenicity for organosilicon compounds: Exploring and enhancing chemical space boundaries.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTPĀ·2026
Same author

Beyond Molecular Structures: Investigating Demographic Factors in Drug-Induced Cardiotoxicity Prediction Models.

Journal of chemical information and modelingĀ·2026
Same author

Simulation of fish chronic toxicity using the Las Vegas algorithm and the vector of ideality of correlation.

Environmental toxicology and chemistryĀ·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
05:47

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

Published on: August 28, 2019

New public QSAR model for carcinogenicity.

Natalja Fjodorova1, Marjan Vracko, Marjana Novic

  • 1National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia. natalja.fjodorova@ki.si.

Chemistry Central Journal
|August 4, 2010
PubMed
Summary

New quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models predict chemical carcinogenicity, aiding regulatory assessment under REACH. These models, developed by the CAESAR project, use chemical descriptors to identify potential carcinogens, supporting risk evaluation.

More Related Videos

Chemical-Induced Skin Carcinogenesis Model Using Dimethylbenz[a]Anthracene and 12-O-Tetradecanoyl Phorbol-13-Acetate (DMBA-TPA)
04:12

Chemical-Induced Skin Carcinogenesis Model Using Dimethylbenz[a]Anthracene and 12-O-Tetradecanoyl Phorbol-13-Acetate (DMBA-TPA)

Published on: December 19, 2019

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHC)
11:38

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHC)

Published on: May 10, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
05:47

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

Published on: August 28, 2019

Chemical-Induced Skin Carcinogenesis Model Using Dimethylbenz[a]Anthracene and 12-O-Tetradecanoyl Phorbol-13-Acetate (DMBA-TPA)
04:12

Chemical-Induced Skin Carcinogenesis Model Using Dimethylbenz[a]Anthracene and 12-O-Tetradecanoyl Phorbol-13-Acetate (DMBA-TPA)

Published on: December 19, 2019

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHC)
11:38

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHC)

Published on: May 10, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Computational toxicology
  • Cheminformatics
  • Regulatory science

Background:

  • The Registration, Evaluation, and Authorization of Chemicals (REACH) regulation necessitates comprehensive data on human health-affecting chemical properties.
  • Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models are recognized as valuable tools for filling data gaps in chemical safety assessments.
  • The EU-funded CAESAR project focused on developing predictive models for five key endpoints relevant to regulatory purposes, including carcinogenicity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate QSAR models for predicting the carcinogenic potency of chemicals, meeting specific regulatory requirements.
  • To create two distinct models utilizing different sets of molecular descriptors for carcinogenicity prediction.
  • To assess the performance and reliability of these models according to established validation principles.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a dataset of 805 non-congeneric chemicals from the Carcinogenic Potency Database (CPDBAS).
  • Implemented the Counter Propagation Artificial Neural Network (CP ANN) algorithm.
  • Developed two models: Model A using eight MDL descriptors and Model B using twelve Dragon descriptors.

Main Results:

  • Model A achieved 91% training set accuracy and 73% test set accuracy, with 69% specificity.
  • Model B achieved 89% training set accuracy and 69% test set accuracy, with 61% specificity.
  • External validation on 738 compounds yielded accuracies of 61.4% (Model A) and 60.0% (Model B).

Conclusions:

  • QSAR models for carcinogenicity prediction offer valuable support for expert evaluation and conventional testing methods.
  • The developed MDL and Dragon descriptor-based models can assist in prioritizing chemicals for further toxicological testing.
  • The CAESAR QSAR models are publicly accessible via a Java implementation on the CAESAR website.