Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
One-Degree-of-Freedom System01:24

One-Degree-of-Freedom System

In mechanical engineering, one-degree-of-freedom systems form the basis of a wide range of electrical and mechanical components. Using these models, engineers can predict the behavior of various parts in a larger system, which gives them insight into how different forces interact with each other.
A one-degree-of-freedom system is defined by an independent variable that determines its state and behavior. One example of a one-degree-of-freedom system is a simple harmonic oscillator, such as a...
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it instrumental in...
Kinematic Equations - II01:17

Kinematic Equations - II

The second kinematic equation expresses the final position of an object in terms of its initial position, the distance traveled with the initial constant velocity, and the distance traveled due to a change in velocity. Similar to the first kinematic equation, this equation is also only valid when the acceleration is constant throughout the motion of an object.
Suppose a car merges into freeway traffic on a 200 m long ramp. If its initial velocity is 10 m/s and it accelerates at 2 m/s2, then the...
Orthogonal Trajectories01:26

Orthogonal Trajectories

Orthogonal trajectories describe the geometric relationship between two families of curves that intersect each other at right angles. One illustrative case involves a family of parabolas that open sideways along the x-axis. These curves share a common shape but differ by a scaling parameter, resulting in a set of curves that all pass through the origin and widen at different rates.Determining Orthogonal TrajectoriesTo identify the orthogonal trajectories for these parabolas, the first step...
Kinematic Equations - III01:18

Kinematic Equations - III

The first two kinematic equations have time as a variable, but the third kinematic equation is independent of time. This equation expresses final velocity as a function of the acceleration and distance over which it acts. The fourth kinematic equation does not have an acceleration term and provides the final position of the object at time t in terms of the initial and final velocities. This equation is useful when the value of the constant acceleration is unknown.
Using the kinematic equations,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stereotyped active sensing in fast-diving echolocating bats.

iScience·2025
Same author

Diazacyclobutenes as Reactive Intermediates: The Cascade Cyclization of Thiolated Ene-ynes and Azodicarboxylates to Provide Tetrahydroindoles.

The Journal of organic chemistry·2025
Same author

Deep image restoration for infrared photothermal heterodyne imaging.

The Journal of chemical physics·2021
Same author

Using Infrared Photothermal Heterodyne Imaging to Characterize Micro- and Nanoplastics in Complex Environmental Matrices.

Environmental science & technology·2021
Same author

Multimodal Image Registration With Line Segments by Selective Search.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2017
Same author

Adaptive whitening of ambient ocean noise with narrowband signal preservation.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2016
Same journal

Mask-guided Asymmetric Contrastive and Semantic Alignment for Unsupervised Person Re-Identification.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2026
Same journal

Hyperbolic Cycle Alignment for Infrared-Visible Image Fusion.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2026
Same journal

Learning Gaze Synthesizer via 3D-eye Controlled Diffusion and Cross-domain Feature Alignment.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2026
Same journal

Underlying Semantic Diffusion for Effective and Efficient In-Context Learning.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2026
Same journal

DiffRES: Unleashing Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Generative Referring Expression Segmentation without Information Leakage.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2026
Same journal

Location Matters: Frequency-Spatial Dual Space Adaptation for Cross-Domain Few-Shot Segmentation.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking
10:16

A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking

Published on: January 3, 2018

Studentized dynamical system for robust object tracking.

Jiading Gai1, Robert L Stevenson

  • 1Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA. jgai@nd.edu

IEEE Transactions on Image Processing : a Publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society
|August 4, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a studentized dynamical system (SDS) for robust target tracking, enhancing outlier handling. The new model improves tracking performance by using heavier-tailed distributions for better noise resilience.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking
10:16

A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking

Published on: January 3, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Computer Vision
  • Machine Learning
  • Robotics

Background:

  • Dynamical systems (DS) are used for temporal sequence modeling.
  • Probabilistic principal component analysis (PPCA) models object appearances but is sensitive to outliers.
  • Gaussian distributions in PPCA have light tails, limiting robustness in real-world data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a more robust target tracking system using dynamical systems.
  • To address the limitations of Gaussian-based observation models in handling outliers.
  • To improve tracking performance in the presence of significant noise.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed a studentized dynamical system (SDS) by augmenting traditional DS with auxiliary latent variables.
  • Adjusted the shape of the observation distribution using these latent variables.
  • Employed heavy-tailed distributions, specifically inspired by the Student's t-distribution, for enhanced robustness.

Main Results:

  • The proposed SDS demonstrates improved capability in handling outlier noise.
  • Achieved better tracking performance compared to traditional DS with Gaussian-based models.
  • The use of auxiliary latent variables effectively created heavier-tailed observation distributions.

Conclusions:

  • Studentized dynamical systems offer a robust approach to target tracking.
  • The SDS framework provides superior performance in noisy environments with outliers.
  • This method advances appearance modeling for visual tracking applications.