Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Automated Midline Shift and Intracranial Pressure Estimation based on Brain CT Images
Published on: April 13, 2013
Evaluation of dual-energy CT for differentiating intracerebral hemorrhage from iodinated contrast material staining
Rajiv Gupta1, Catherine M Phan, Christianne Leidecker
1Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Neuroradiology GRB-273A, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Insights
Dual-energy CT effectively distinguishes intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) from iodinated contrast material. This advanced imaging technique offers high accuracy in identifying bleeding versus contrast staining in patients receiving contrast agents.
Area of Science:
- Radiology and Imaging Science
- Medical Diagnostics
- Neuroimaging
Background:
- Distinguishing intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) from iodinated contrast material is crucial in acute stroke and head trauma patients.
- Iodinated contrast material administration (intraarterial or intravenous) can mimic hemorrhage on standard CT scans.
- Accurate differentiation is essential for appropriate patient management and treatment decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of dual-energy computed tomography (CT) in differentiating intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) from iodinated contrast material.
- To assess the ability of dual-energy CT to distinguish hyperattenuation caused by contrast staining from true hemorrhage.
- To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of dual-energy CT in this differentiation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 18 patients (16 acute stroke, 2 head trauma) who received iodinated contrast material.
- Dual-energy CT imaging performed at 80 and 140 kV.
- Application of a three-material decomposition algorithm to generate virtual unenhanced and iodine overlay images for differentiation.
Main Results:
- Dual-energy CT correctly classified 28 intraparenchymal hyperattenuation areas: 71% as contrast material, 18% as hemorrhage, and 11% as both.
- Sensitivity for hemorrhage identification was 100%, specificity was 91%, and overall accuracy was 93%.
- Two cases initially suspected as hemorrhage were identified as mineralization on dual-energy CT.
Conclusions:
- Dual-energy CT is a highly sensitive and specific tool for differentiating intracerebral hemorrhage from iodinated contrast material staining.
- This technique is valuable in patients who have recently undergone intraarterial or intravenous contrast administration.
- Dual-energy CT aids in accurate diagnosis, potentially improving patient management in neurovascular emergencies.
Purpose:
To evaluate the efficacy of dual-energy computed tomography (CT) in the differentiation of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) from iodinated contrast material in patients who received contrast material via intraarterial or intravenous delivery.
Materials And Methods:
This retrospective study was approved by the local institutional review board, which waived the informed consent requirement for the analysis. Sixteen patients with acute stroke and two with head trauma who had undergone intraarterial or intravenous administration of iodinated contrast material were evaluated by using dual-energy CT to differentiate areas of hyperattenuation secondary to contrast material staining from those representing ICH. A dual-energy CT scanner was used for imaging at 80 and 140 kV, and a three-material decomposition algorithm was used to obtain virtual unenhanced images and iodine overlay images. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of dual-energy CT in the prospective differentiation of intraparenchymal contrast material from hemorrhage were obtained. Follow-up images were used as the standard of reference.
Results:
There were 28 intraparenchymal areas of hyperattenuation classified at dual-energy CT as iodinated contrast material staining (n = 20, 71%), hemorrhage (n = 5, 18%), or both (n = 3, 11%). Two of the three areas of hyperattenuation seen on both virtual unenhanced and iodine overlay images were related to mineralization. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of dual-energy CT in the identification of hemorrhage were 100% (six of six areas), 91% (20 of 22 areas), and 93% (26 of 28 areas), respectively.
Conclusion:
Dual-energy CT can help differentiate ICH from iodinated contrast material staining with high sensitivity and specificity in patients who have recently received intraarterial or intravenous iodinated contrast material.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

