Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Longitudinal Studies01:26

Longitudinal Studies

Longitudinal studies are also widely used in other medical and social science fields. For instance, in cardiovascular research, they can monitor patients' health over decades to identify risk factors for heart disease, such as high cholesterol or smoking, and evaluate the long-term effectiveness of preventive measures. Similarly, in mental health studies, researchers might follow individuals from adolescence into adulthood to understand the development and progression of conditions like...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Connect Kits for Family Action: Intervention Development and Exploratory Data Analysis of Proximal Outcomes.

Journal of child & adolescent substance use·2026
Same author

Reliability of the Telehealth Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination at 24 Months: A Prospective Counterbalanced Observational Study.

Pediatric neurology·2026
Same author

Characteristics of People Who Inject Drugs Approached for Injection Assistance in Rural Kentucky.

Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs·2026
Same author

Motivations for Nonuse as Predictors of Substance Use Among Reservation-Based Youth in a Computerized Screening and Brief Intervention: The Power of Positive People.

Journal of child & adolescent substance use·2026
Same author

Peritoneal drainage in spontaneous intestinal perforation: a 20-year single center review.

Pediatric surgery international·2026
Same author

From Slices to Surfaces: The Feasibility of Fetal Brain Biometry Using 3D Slice-to-Volume MRI in Clinical Practice.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2026

Related Experiment Videos

Efforts to adjust for confounding by neighborhood using complex survey data.

Babette A Brumback1, Amy B Dailey, Zhulin He

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. bbrumback@phhp.ufl.edu

Statistics in Medicine
|August 4, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Estimating individual health effects requires accounting for neighborhood influences. New methods are needed as current approaches struggle with strong sampling bias in social epidemiology.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Social Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Neighborhoods significantly impact health outcomes, independent of individual factors.
  • Confounding by neighborhood effects complicates the estimation of individual exposure effects.
  • Analysis of National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data highlights these challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and compare statistical methods for estimating individual exposure effects while controlling for neighborhood confounding.
  • To evaluate the performance of different regression models in the presence of complex survey designs and neighborhood effects.
  • To adapt Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs) for better adjustment of neighborhood confounding in survey data.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of three classes of methods: ordinary logistic regression, conditional logistic regression, and generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs).
  • Adaptation of GLMMs to address confounding by neighborhood (cluster) effects in survey data.
  • Utilizing theoretical analysis, simulation studies, and real-world NHIS data analysis.

Main Results:

  • Existing methods, including standard GLMMs, show limitations in adjusting for neighborhood confounding, especially with small clusters.
  • All evaluated methods performed poorly under conditions of strong sampling bias.
  • The study identified specific challenges in accurately estimating individual effects when neighborhood context is a significant factor.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate estimation of individual health effects in social epidemiology necessitates robust methods to handle neighborhood confounding.
  • Current statistical approaches are insufficient when sampling bias is substantial.
  • Further research and novel methodologies are crucial for advancing the analysis of contextual effects on health.