Related Experiment Videos
Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension
Ning Chen1, Muke Zhou, Mi Yang
1Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Wai Nan Guo Xue Xiang #37, Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041.
Insights
Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) show mixed results as first-line hypertension therapy. While effective against beta-blockers, they increase heart failure risk compared to diuretics, ACE inhibitors, and ARBs.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Hypertension Research
Background:
- Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) represent a newer class of antihypertensive medications.
- The comparative effectiveness of first-line CCBs against other antihypertensive drug classes for preventing cardiovascular events remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if first-line CCBs, compared to other antihypertensive drug classes, differ in their ability to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
- Searches included major databases (Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE) up to May 2009.
- Included RCTs compared first-line CCBs with other antihypertensive classes, involved at least 100 participants, and had a follow-up of ≥2 years.
Main Results:
- Eighteen RCTs with 141,807 participants were analyzed.
- CCBs reduced cardiovascular events, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality compared to beta-blockers.
- CCBs increased cardiovascular events and heart failure compared to diuretics, and stroke/MI compared to ACE inhibitors/ARBs.
Conclusions:
- Diuretics may be preferred over CCBs for optimal cardiovascular event reduction.
- Evidence supports CCB use over beta-blockers, but not definitively over ACE inhibitors or ARBs.
- Further research is needed to clarify CCB efficacy across diverse hypertensive populations.
Background:
Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are a relatively new antihypertensive class. The effect of first-line CCBs on the prevention of cardiovascular events, as compared with other antihypertensive drug classes, is unknown.
Objectives:
To determine whether CCBs used as first-line therapy for hypertension are different from other first-line drug classes in reducing the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events.
Search Strategy:
Electronic searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASEand the WHO-ISH Collaboration Register (up to May 2009) were performed. We also checked the references of published studies to identify additional trials.
Selection Criteria:
Randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing first-line CCBs with other antihypertensive classes, with at least 100 randomized hypertensive participants and with a follow-up of at least two years.
Data Collection And Analysis:
Two authors independently selected the included trials, evaluated the risk of bias and entered the data for analysis.
Main Results:
Eighteen RCTs (14 dihydropyridines, 4 non-dihydropyridines) with a total of 141,807 participants were included. All-cause mortality was not different between first-line CCBs and any other first-line antihypertensive classes. CCBs reduced the following outcomes as compared to beta-blockers: total cardiovascular events (RR 0.84, 95% CI [0.77, 0.92]), stroke (RR 0.77, 95% CI [0.67, 0.88]) and cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI [0.81, 0.99]). CCBs increased total cardiovascular events (RR 1.05 , 95% CI [1.00, 1.09], p = 0.03) and congestive heart failure events (RR 1.37, 95% CI [1.25, 1.51]) as compared to diuretics. CCBs reduced stroke (RR 0.89, 95% CI [0.80, 0.98]) as compared to ACE inhibitors and reduced stroke (RR 0.85, 95% CI [0.73, 0.99]) and MI (RR 0.83, 95% CI [0.72, 0.96]) as compared to ARBs. CCBs also increased congestive heart failure events as compared to ACE inhibitors (RR 1.16, 95% CI [1.06, 1.27]) and ARBs (RR 1.20, 95% CI [1.06, 1.36]). The other evaluated outcomes were not significantly different.
Authors' Conclusions:
Diuretics are preferred first-line over CCBs to optimize reduction of cardiovascular events. The review does not distinguish between CCBs, ACE inhibitors or ARBs, but does provide evidence supporting the use of CCBs over beta-blockers. Many of the differences found in the current review are not robust and further trials might change the conclusions. More well-designed RCTs studying the mortality and morbidity of patients taking CCBs as compared with other antihypertensive drug classes are needed for patients with different stages of hypertension, different ages, and with different co-morbidities such as diabetes.
Related Concept Videos
Antihypertensive Drugs: Action of Calcium Channel Blockers
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Antiepileptic Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers
Calcium channel blockers exert their antiepileptic effects by targeting T-type calcium channels, which are integral to transmitting nerve signals in the central nervous system. These channels allow the passage of calcium ions, which are vital for neuronal communication. By inhibiting T-type calcium channels, calcium channel blockers effectively reduce the release of neurotransmitters and...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...