Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
Published on: June 28, 2018
Determination of spin Hamiltonians from projected single reference configuration interaction calculations. I. Spin
A Monari1, D Maynau, J-P Malrieu
1Laboratoire de Chimie et Physique Quantiques, UMR 5626 of CNRS, IRSAMC, Université de Toulouse, 118 Rte de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse Cedex, France. antonio.monari@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr
Abstract:
The most reliable wave-function based treatments of magnetic systems usually start from a complete active space self-consistent field calculation of the magnetic electrons in the magnetic orbitals, followed by extensive and expensive configuration interaction (CI) calculations. This second step, which introduces crucial spin polarization and dynamic correlation effects, is necessary to reach reliable values of the magnetic coupling constants. The computational cost of these approaches increases exponentially with the number of unpaired electrons. The single-determinantal unrestricted density functional Kohn-Sham calculations are computationally much simpler, and may provide reasonable estimates of these quantities, but their results are strongly dependent on the chosen exchange-correlation potential. The present work, which may be seen as an ab initio transcription of the unrestricted density functional theory technique, returns to the perturbative definition of the Heisenberg Hamiltonian as an effective Hamiltonian, and proposes a direct estimate of its diagonal energies through single reference CI calculations. The differences between these diagonal terms actually determine the entire Heisenberg Hamiltonian. The reference determinants must be vectors of the model space and the components on the other vectors of the model space are cancelled along the iterative process. The method is successfully tested on a series of bicentric and multicentric spin 12 systems. The projected single reference difference dedicated CI treatment is both accurate and of moderate cost. It opens the way to parameter-free calculations of large spin assemblies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
The Pauli Exclusion Principle
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin
Atomic nuclei have a net nuclear spin, , which can have an integer or half-integer value. In atomic nuclei, the spins of protons are paired against each other but not with neutrons, and vice versa. Consequently, an even number of protons does not contribute to...

